Influence of emissivity angular variation on land surface temperature retrieved using the generalized split-window algorithm

Hu, Tian Li, Hua Cao, Biao van Dijk, Albert I. J. M. Renzullo, Luigi J. Xu, Zhihong Zhou, Jun Du, Yongming Liu, Qinhuo

Influence of emissivity angular variation on land surface temperature retrieved using the generalized split-window algorithm

Hu, Tian 1Li, Hua 2Cao, Biao 2van Dijk, Albert I. J. M. 3Renzullo, Luigi J. 3Xu, Zhihong 1Zhou, Jun 1Du, Yongming 2Liu, Qinhuo2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Environm Futures Res Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
  • 2. Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
  • 3. Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
  • 折叠

Abstract

The angular variation of land surface emissivity (LSE) is rarely considered in the split-window algorithm for retrieving land surface temperature (LST), and this can cause large uncertainties in LST retrievals. To analyze the influence of angular LSE variation on LST retrievals, we built a look-up table (LUT) of directional emissivities from the MYD21A1 LST/LSE product in the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) split-window channels. The extracted directional emissivities were then input into the MODIS generalized split-window (GSW) algorithm to substitute for the classification-based emissivities. A simulation analysis was first conducted based on the LUT. Furthermore, the LST retrievals estimated from MODIS observations using the directional emissivities were compared with those estimated using the classification-based emissivities. In-situ measurements from the US SURFRAD and China's HiWATER networks were used to evaluate LST retrievals obtained using the two different emissivities. The results showed that angular LSE variations in the split-window channels for vegetated surfaces were generally minor during the daytime, but more pronounced during the night-time (approximately 0.005 between nadir and 60 degrees). For barren surfaces, the angular LSE variation in the (similar to)12 mu m channel was negligible but reached approximately 0.01 in the (similar to)11 mu m channel. In the simulation, the influence of angular LSE variation was minor for view-zenith angles (VZA) < 40 degrees, but pronounced for VZA > 40 degrees reaching approximately 1.0 and 0.7 K at VZA 65 degrees for barren and vegetated surfaces, respectively. In the evaluation, the LST estimated using the directional emissivities showed a higher accuracy than those estimated using the classification-based emissivities, especially over barren surfaces where the improvement reached > 1 K. We conclude that angular LSE variation cannot be ignored in LST estimation using the GSW algorithm when VZA is > 40 degrees, especially over barren surfaces. The accuracy of the GSW algorithm is improved pronouncedly by using the directional emissivities extracted from the MYD21 product.

Key words

LST/LSE/Directional emissivity/GSW

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2019
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation

International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation

SCI
ISSN:0303-2434
被引量9
参考文献量63
段落导航相关论文