首页|Propensity for erosion and deposition in a deltaic wetland complex: Implications for river management and coastal restoration

Propensity for erosion and deposition in a deltaic wetland complex: Implications for river management and coastal restoration

扫码查看
原文链接
  • NSTL
  • Elsevier
<![CDATA[<ce:abstract xmlns:ce="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/dtd" xmlns="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" id="ab0005" xml:lang="en" view="all" class="author"> <ce:section-title id="st0005">Abstract</ce:section-title> <ce:abstract-sec id="as0005" view="all"> <ce:simple-para id="sp0070" view="all">The Mississippi River Delta is one of the most rapidly changing area on Earth, with large areas experiencing land loss and smaller areas experiencing loss. While some of the drivers of these changes are well known (high rates of relative sea level rise, reduced sediment inputs, canal dredging), debate exists about other drivers. One area that has received substantial attention is the role of, “river diversions,” areas where sediments and water are diverted from the Mississippi River into degrading wetlands with the hope of reinitiating deltaic land building processes. Some authors have argued that diversions lead to reduced shear strengths of wetland soils that make them more vulnerable to storm driven erosion, while other authors have argued that sediments from river diversions will develop stable land. This study examined this controversy in the Cubits Gap Subdelta, an analogue for a large (&gt;<ce:hsp sp="0.10"/>1420<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>m<ce:sup loc="post">3</ce:sup> <ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>s<ce:sup loc="post">?<ce:hsp sp="0.10"/>1</ce:sup>) river diversion by testing the hypothesis that areas of land gain, and/or resilience to erosion occurred in areas that actively received river sediments and as a result had mineral rich soils with high shear strength. To accomplish this, a Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) was developed for Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM<ce:hsp sp="0.10"/>+) and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images. The NDWI was calculated from (Blue<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>?<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>SWIR)<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>/<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>(Blue<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>+<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>SWIR), where SWIR is the shorter wavelength, and yielded land/water boundary maps with 30<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>m resolution. Results indicate that land gain occurred predominantly in the riverside section of this subdelta where sediments were imported from Mississippi River crevasses and/or dredging. Land loss typically occurred in the distal regions of the subdelta, which had lower levels of sediment supply and greater wave exposure. Sediment geotechnical analyses revealed land loss pixels generally correlated sediments with to high organic contents (9.0<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>1.9%), water contents (54.8<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>3.7%) and salinity (6.5<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>2.0<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>PSU), with low shear strengths (5.7<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>0.8<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>kN<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>m<ce:sup loc="post">?<ce:hsp sp="0.10"/>2</ce:sup>) and low bulk density (0.6<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>0.8<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>g cm<ce:sup loc="post">?<ce:hsp sp="0.10"/>3</ce:sup>), whereas land gain pixels generally correlate with low organic content (3.9<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>0.6%), water content (38.1<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>4.2%) high shear strength (10.9<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>4.1<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>kN<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>m<ce:sup loc="post">?<ce:hsp sp="0.10"/>2</ce:sup>) and bulk density (1.00<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>±<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>0.1<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>g<ce:hsp sp="0.25"/>cm<ce:sup loc="post">?<ce:hsp sp="0.10"/>3</ce:sup>). This study suggests plans to restore the region by partially diverting the flow of the Mississippi River will be most successful if they carry high loads of sediment, and that concerns about the integrity of fresh marsh may be unwarranted if those marshes are sediment rich.</ce:simple-para> </ce:abstract-sec> </ce:abstract><ce:abstract xmlns:ce="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/dtd" xmlns="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" id="ab0010" class="autho

Reda Amer、Alexander S. Kolker、Annelise Muscietta

展开 >

Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Tulane University

2017

10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.030

Remote Sensing of Environment

Remote Sensing of Environment

EIISTP
ISSN：0034-4257
年,卷(期)：2017.199
  • 8
  • 49