首页|Corrigendum to “Accommodating heteroscedasticity in allometric biomass models” [For. Ecol. Manage. 505 (2022) 119865] (Forest Ecology and Management (2022) 505, (S0378112721009567), (10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119865))
Corrigendum to “Accommodating heteroscedasticity in allometric biomass models” [For. Ecol. Manage. 505 (2022) 119865] (Forest Ecology and Management (2022) 505, (S0378112721009567), (10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119865))
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NSTL
Elsevier
? 2022 Elsevier B.V.The authors regret two errors: (1) In Eq. (9), df should have been nb: [Formula presented] where nb is the sample size of biomass dataset. (iv) calculate the p-value of the χ2 statistic, using the right tail of a χ2 distribution with df = 1 for Eq. (7) and df = 2 for Eq. (8), degrees of freedom. The null hypothesis of homoscedasticity is rejected if p < 0.05.(2) In Table 2, weighting procedure 4, step (iii), the residual term in the model expression was missing. The correct expression should have been: [Formula presented]. Despite these textual errors, the analyses were correctly conducted and, therefore, the results were not affected. The authors apologise for this inconvenience.
Dutca I.、McRoberts R.E.、Naesset E.、Blujdea V.N.B.
展开 >
Department of Silviculture Transilvania University of Brasov
Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota
Faculty of Ecology and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Bio-Economy Unit European Commission Joint Research Centre
NSTL
Elsevier
