查看更多>>摘要:目的 了解新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)康复期IgG抗体水平及其与新型冠状病毒疫苗接种的关系。 方法 本研究为前瞻性队列研究。采用非随机抽样的方法,选取2023年2月至5月在清华大学第一附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科门诊和病房就诊的185例COVID-19康复者为研究对象。记录患者一般资料、发病时间、病情严重程度、接种新型冠状病毒疫苗情况。收集患者感染后6、8、10、12、14、16、18周不同时间点静脉血,采用半定量磁微粒化学发光法检测血清免疫球蛋白(Ig)G、IgM抗体水平。按照新型冠状病毒疫苗接种情况分为疫苗接种组(接种2剂次以上灭活疫苗,共130例)和疫苗未接种组(因各种原因未能接种疫苗,共55例)。将2组中>75岁康复者分别纳入亚组,疫苗接种亚组(18例)和疫苗未接种亚组(28例)。比较康复者整体、2组和2亚组各时间点的IgG、IgM抗体水平。 结果 185例COVID-19康复者中男80例,女105例;年龄62.0(40.5,75.0)岁;111例(60.00%)合并基础病。2组患者的性别比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.03,P=0.874);疫苗未接种组年龄、合并基础病、重症或危重症比例均较疫苗接种组高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。2亚组患者的性别、年龄、重症或危重症比例比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);疫苗未接种亚组合并基础病比例较疫苗接种亚组高,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.30,P=0.038)。全体康复者体内IgM抗体水平均为阴性。康复者整体IgG抗体水平在感染后第10周达到峰值,之后逐渐下降,于随访期末达最低值。疫苗接种组感染后第6、8、10、12、14、16、18周的IgG抗体水平均高于疫苗未接种组,差异均有统计学意义[157.9(73.4,240.0)比4.7(1.7,17.7),Z=2.36;132.0(75.3,213.1)比2.8(0.7,52.6),Z=3.77;137.7(79.9,227.0)比1.1(0.4,15.2),Z=4.51;134.5(81.4,211.9)比1.0(0.5,2.9),Z=3.49;92.4(68.9,112.9)比1.7(1.2,2.4),Z=2.84;61.2(33.3,108.7)比2.9(1.3,12.8),Z=3.45;57.1(32.7,87.6)比1.1(0.8,8.3),Z=4.06;均P<0.05]。疫苗接种亚组感染后第8、12、16周的IgG抗体水平均高于疫苗未接种亚组,差异均有统计学意义[261.5(225.4,304.9)比13.8(0.5,126.8),Z=2.34;134.5(104.8,283.6)比1.2(0.5,2.9),Z=2.74;61.5(10.9,147.8)比1.9(1.2,27.4),Z=2.11;均P<0.05]。 结论 随着康复期延长,COVID-19康复者体内IgG抗体水平在达峰后逐渐下降。完成全程新型冠状病毒疫苗接种人群在患COVID-19后较未接种人群体内能产生更高水平的IgG抗体。 Objective To measure the titer of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody during the recovery period from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and their relationship with COVID-19 vaccine administration. Methods It was a prospective cohort study.One hundred and eighty-five patients recovered from COVID-19 admitted in the outpatient and inpatient, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First Hospital of Tsinghua University from February 2023 to May 2023 were enrolled using the non-random sampling method.Baseline characteristics, onset time, severity, and COVID-19 vaccine administration details were recorded.Blood samples were collected at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 weeks after the infection of COVID-19.Serum titers of IgG and IgM antibodies were measured by the semi-quantitative magnetic particle chemiluminescence method.Participants were categorized into vaccination group (received ≥2 doses of vaccinations, n=130) and non-vaccination group (n=55).Participants over 75 years old and recovered from COVID-19 were subgrouped into vaccination subgroup (n=18) and non-vaccination subgroup (n=28).IgG and IgM titers were compared in the overall cohort, two groups and two subgroups. Results Among 185 patients recovered from COVID-19, there were 80 males and 105 females with the mean age of 62.0(40.5, 75.0) years.There were 111 cases (60.00%) of underlying diseases.There was no significant difference in gender between vaccination group and non-vaccination group (χ2=0.03, P=0.874).The age and proportions of patients combined with underlying diseases, and severe or critically ill patients in the non-vaccination group were significantly higher than those in the vaccination group (all P<0.01).In subgroups, there were no significant differences in the gender, age and proportion of severe or critically ill patients (allP>0.05), but the proportion of patients with underlying diseases in the non-vaccination subgroup was significantly higher than that in the vaccination subgroup (χ2=4.30, P=0.038).Negative IgM was detected in all participants.The IgG titer peaked at week 10 post-infection, which was gradually declined by the end of the follow-up period.The IgG titer in vaccination group at 6 weeks (157.9[73.4, 240.0] vs 4.7[1.7, 17.7], Z=2.36), 8 weeks (132.0[75.3, 213.1] vs 2.8[0.7, 52.6], Z=3.77), 10 weeks (137.7[79.9, 227.0] vs 1.1[0.4, 15.2], Z=4.51), 12 weeks (134.5[81.4, 211.9] vs 1.0[0.5, 2.9], Z=3.49), 14 weeks (92.4[68.9, 112.9] vs 1.7[1.2, 2.4], Z=2.84), 16 weeks (61.2[33.3, 108.7] vs 2.9[1.3, 12.8], Z=3.45) and 18 weeks (57.1[32.7, 87.6] vs 1.1[0.8, 8.3], Z=4.06) was significantly higher than that of non-vaccination group (all P<0.05).The IgG titer in vaccination subgroup at 8 weeks (261.5[225.4, 304.9]vs 13.8[0.5, 126.8], Z=2.34), 12 weeks (134.5[104.8, 283.6] vs 1.2[0.5, 2.9], Z=2.74) and 16 weeks (61.5[10.9, 147.8] vs 1.9[1.2, 27.4], Z=2.11) was significantly higher than that of non-vaccination subgroup (all P<0.05). Conclusions As the recovery period extends, serum titer of IgG antibody increases to the peak and gradually decreases in patients recovered from COVID-19.Individuals who have completed the full course of the COVID-19 vaccine generate higher titers of IgG antibodies after the infection of COVID-19 compared to those who have not been vaccinated.