查看更多>>摘要:目的 探讨认知双重任务下早期帕金森病患者的步态学特征,为帕金森病的早期诊断、及时治疗及合理康复提供敏感的运动学指标。 方法 选取2021年9月至2023年8月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院石景山院区门诊及住院的62例早期非震颤型帕金森病患者作为试验组,选择同时期其年龄构成比具有可比性的体检人员或患者家属62名作为健康对照组,比较两组受试者就诊时的基线资料、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)运动部分步态评价得分,应用可穿戴步态分析设备分别采集两组受试者在单任务和双重任务下的步态参数,量化早期帕金森病患者的足部运动学特征。采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验分析两组的步态参数,将有统计学意义的变量纳入Logistic回归分析以探索步态参数与帕金森病的关联,最后通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来估计变量的诊断价值。 结果 步态时空参数(每个步态周期):(1)单任务下行走时,帕金森病组的步速较对照组[(1.01±0.12)m/s比(1.22±0.18)m/s,t=-7.526]减慢,双足支撑时间较对照组[(0.29±0.05)s比(0.22±0.06)s,t=6.659]增加,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。(2)双任务下行走时,帕金森病组的步速[(0.88±0.11)m/s比(1.19±0.16)m/s,t=-12.158,P<0.001]较对照组减小,双足支撑时间[(0.36±0.05)s比(0.22±0.05)s,t=12.848,P<0.001]较对照组增加,步幅较对照组[(109.20±6.21)cm比(112.77±5.87)cm,t=-3.203,P=0.010]减小,步频较对照组[(114.45±7.10)步/min比(110.87±7.16)步/min,t=2.724,P=0.020]增加,单足支撑时间较对照组[(0.49±0.12)s比(0.45±0.06)s,t=2.643,P=0.020]增加,以上差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。步态运动学参数:(1)单任务下行走时,帕金森病组运动时足部在矢状面移动的最大角度较对照组(17.19°±2.37°比19.71°±2.92°,t=-4.691,P<0.001)减小,在矢状面移动的最小角度较对照组(-67.08°±4.63°比-70.10°±3.94°,t=0.395,P=0.001)减小(负号代表运动方向);足部在水平面移动的最小角度较对照组(9.08°±4.02°比11.80°±3.60°,t=-3.461,P<0.001)减小;足部在冠状面移动的最小角度较对照组(-10.55°±2.87°比-12.04°±2.31°,t=2.831,P=0.030)减小(负号仅代表移动方向),足部的着地角度较对照组(11.14°±2.78°比12.78°±3.57°,t=-2.779,P=0.030)减小,差异均具有统计学意义。(2)双重任务行走时,帕金森病组的矢状面最大移动角度(15.44°±2.54°比18.99°±2.71°,t=-6.673,P<0.05)、矢状面最小移动角度(-65.68°±4.73°比-70.02°±4.04°,t=-4.747,P<0.001]、冠状面最小移动角度(-11.15°±2.99°比-13.18°±2.50°,t=3.642,P=0.020)、着地角度(11.01°±3.10°比12.83°±4.01°,t=-2.438,P=0.010)、水平面最小移动角度(8.83°±4.04°比11.83°±3.63°,t=-3.776,P<0.001)以及离地角度(-65.00°±3.54°比-67.06°±3.61°,t=3.133,P<0.001)均较对照组减小,差异均具有统计学意义。Logistis回归分析结果显示步频(OR=1.124,95%CI 1.040~1.201,P=0.001)和冠状面最小移动角度均与帕金森病呈正相关(OR=1.501,95%CI 1.040~2.151,P=0.030),步幅与帕金森病呈负相关(OR=0.902,95%CI 0.830~0.978,P=0.010)。采用ROC曲线评估步频、步幅和冠状面最小移动角度的诊断价值,结果显示对于步频,当约登指数最大为0.880时,区分帕金森病组与对照组的最佳截止值为115.000,敏感度为0.577,特异度为0.710,曲线下面积为0.656。对于冠状面最小移动角度,当约登指数最大为0.251时,区分帕金森病组与对照组的最佳截止值为-12.575,敏感度为0.728,特异度为0.531,曲线下面积为0.670。对于步幅,当约登指数最大为0时,区分帕金森病组与对照组的最佳截止值为100.911,敏感度为0.950,特异度为0.050,曲线下面积为0.300。 结论 步态参数中的步频、冠状面最小移动角度作为反映早期帕金森病步态特征的运动学标志物,在跟踪评价早期帕金森病患者步态障碍特征及预测罹患帕金森病风险大小方面可能有一定帮助。认知-运动双重任务行走时早期帕金森病患者的某些步态参数较健康人有更显著的差异性。 Objective To investigate the gait characteristics of patients with early Parkinson′s disease (PD) under cognitive dual task, and to provide sensitive kinematic indicators for the early diagnosis, timely treatment and reasonable rehabilitation of PD. Methods A total of 62 outpatients and inpatients with early non-tremor Parkinson′s disease in Shijingshan Branch of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from September 2021 to August 2023 were selected as experimental group (PD group), and 62 healthy controls with comparable age composition ratio were selected as control group. The baseline data, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale scores, and the gait assessment scores of the motor part of the Unified Parkinson′s Disease Rating Scale were compared between the 2 groups. The wearable gait analysis device was used to collect the gait parameters of the 2 groups of subjects under single task and dual task, and the foot kinematic characteristics of the patients with early PD were quantified. Independent sample t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the gait parameters of the 2 groups. The statistically significant variables were included in Logistic regression analysis to explore the association between gait parameters and PD. Finally, the diagnostic value of the variables was estimated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Gait spatio-temporal parameters (per gait cycle): (1) The gait speed of the PD group was slower than that of the control group [(1.01±0.12) m/s vs (1.22±0.18) m/s, t=-7.526] during single task walking. The bipedal support time in the PD group was significantly longer than that in the control group [(0.29±0.05) s vs (0.22±0.06) s, t=6.659]. The differences were both statistically significant (both P<0.001). (2) During dual-task walking, PD patients showed slower gait speed [(0.88±0.11) m/svs (1.19±0.16) m/s, t=-12.158, P<0.001]. The bipedal support time in the PD group was longer than that in the control group [(0.36±0.05) svs (0.22±0.05) s, t=12.828, P<0.001]. PD patients had shorter stride length [(109.20±6.21) cmvs (112.77±5.87) cm, t=-3.203, P=0.010]. Stride frequency in the PD group was higher than that in the control group [(114.45±7.10) steps/min vs (110.87±7.16) steps/min, t=2.724, P=0.020]. The single leg support time was longer than that of the control group [(0.49±0.12) svs (0.45±0.06) s, t=2.643, P=0.020] , and the differences were statistically significant. Gait kinematics parameters: (1) During single task walking, the maximum angle of foot movement in the sagittal plane in the PD group was smaller than that in the control group (17.19°±2.37° vs 19.71°±2.92°, t=-4.691, P<0.001). The minimum angle of movement in the sagittal plane was smaller than that in the control group (-67.08°±4.63°vs -70.10°±3.94°, t=0.395, P=0.001). The minimum horizontal angle of the foot during exercise in the PD group was lower than that in the control group (9.08°±4.02° vs 11.80°±3.60°, t=-3.461, P<0.001). The minimum angle of the foot coronal plane in the PD group was smaller than that in the control group (-10.55°±2.87°vs -12.04°±2.31°, t=2.831, P=0.030 the negative sign only represents the movement direction). The touch angle of the foot in the PD group was significantly lower than that in the control group (11.14°±2.78° vs 12.78°±3.57°, t=-2.779, P=0.030). (2) During dual-task walking, the maximum sagittal angle (15.44°±2.54° vs 18.99°±2.71°, t=-6.673, P<0.05), the minimum angle of sagittal plane (-65.68°±4.73°vs -70.02°±4.04°, t=-4.747, P<0.001 the negative sign only represents the direction of movement), the minimum coronal movement angle (-11.15°± 2.99°vs -13.18°±2.50°, t=3.642, P=0.020), the touch angle (11.01°±3.10° vs 12.83°±4.01°, t=-2.438, P=0.010), the minimum horizontal angle (8.83°±4.04° vs 11.83°±3.63°, t=-3.776, P<0.001), and the change of the angle from the ground (-65.00°±3.54° vs -67.06°±3.61°, t=3.133, P<0.001) in the PD group were all smaller than that in the control group. The differences were all statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that step frequency was positively correlated with PD (OR=1.124,95%CI 1.040-1.201, P=0.001), minimum angle of coronal plane was positively correlated with PD (OR=1.501, 95%CI 1.040-2.151, P=0.030). Stride length was negatively correlated with PD (OR=0.902, 95%CI 0.830-0.978, P=0.010). ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of step frequency, stride length and minimum angle of coronal plane. For step frequency, when the maximum Youden index was 0.880, the best cut-off value to distinguish the PD group from the control group was 115.000, the sensitivity was 0.577, the specificity was 0.710, and the area under the curve was 0.656. For the minimum coronal angle, when the maximum Youden index was 0.251, the best cut-off value was -12.575, the sensitivity was 0.728, the specificity was 0.531, and the area under the curve was 0.670. For stride length, when the maximum Youden index was 0, the best cut-off value was 100.91, the sensitivity was 0.950, the specificity was 0.050, and the area under the curve was 0.300. Conclusions Some gait parameters such as step frequency and minimum angle of coronal plane can be used as kinematic markers to reflect the gait characteristics of early PD, which may be helpful in tracking and evaluating the gait disorder characteristics of early PD patients and predicting the risk of PD. Some gait parameters of PD patients are significantly different from those of healthy people during cognitive-motor dual-task walking.