安徽农业科学2016,Issue(12) :111-113.

运用多维价值理论评价引种黄金果猕猴桃果实品质

Evaluation on Fruit Quality of Introduced Cultivars of Kiwi Fruit with the Multi-value Theory

吴亚楠 刘婷 刘惠民
安徽农业科学2016,Issue(12) :111-113.

运用多维价值理论评价引种黄金果猕猴桃果实品质

Evaluation on Fruit Quality of Introduced Cultivars of Kiwi Fruit with the Multi-value Theory

吴亚楠 1刘婷 1刘惠民1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 西南林业大学,云南昆明 650224
  • 折叠

摘要

[目的]研究引种黄金果猕猴桃的果实品质差异,为黄金果猕猴桃的品种改良和优良品种选育提供参考.[方法]以引种黄金果猕猴桃果实的单果重以及可溶性固形物、可溶性总糖、可滴定酸和VC含量等指标作为评价目标,采用“合理-满意度”和多维价值理论合并规则进行综合比较分析.[结果]试验表明,黄金果猕猴桃果实品质差异明显,供试品种编号15的果实Vc和可滴定酸含量最高;编号5的果实可溶性固形物含量最高;编号19的果实单果重最大,总糖含量最高,糖酸比最大.合成合理满意度最高的是19号品种,最低的是11号品种.[结论]引种的黄金果猕猴桃中19号品质最好,适宜推广.

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to study the differences of fruit quality among introduced cultivars of kiwi fruit,provide reference for variety improvement and excellent variety breeding.[Method] With single fruit weight,soluble solids,soluble sugar,titratable acidity and Vc as evaluation indicators,comprehensive analysis was conducted by rationalization-satisfaction and multi-value theory.[Result] The results showed that the fruit quality had significant difference,among tested varieties,Vc and titratable acidity content in No.15 was highest;soluble solids content in No.5 was highest;single fruit weight in No.19 was heaviest,total sugar content was highest,the ratio of sugar and acid was biggest.The highest satisfactory degree was No.19,and lowest was No.11.[Conclusion] The quality of No.19 is best among the introduced cultivars of kiwi fruit,and it is suitable for promotion.

关键词

多维价值理论/果实品质/比较分析/评价

Key words

Multi-value theory/Fruit quality/Comparative analysis/Evaluation

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家林业局948项目(2014-4-62)

出版年

2016
安徽农业科学
安徽省农业科学院

安徽农业科学

影响因子:0.413
ISSN:0517-6611
被引量7
参考文献量14
段落导航相关论文