摘要
[目的]比较不同饲养模式下肉鹅的生产性能。[方法]选用3600只江南白鹅，随机分为4组，分别采用舍内地面＋舍外运动场＋河流（Ⅰ组）、舍内地面＋舍外运动场＋小水池（Ⅱ组）、舍内网架＋舍外运动场＋河流（Ⅲ组）、舍内网架＋舍外运动场＋小水池（Ⅳ组）4种方式进行饲养，研究不同饲养方式对江南白鹅生产性能和屠宰性能的影响。[结果]采用舍内网架＋舍外运动场＋河流饲养方式的Ⅲ组江南白鹅的体重显著高于其他组（P＜0．05），Ⅲ组江南白鹅的上市体重高于其他组，但差异不显著（P＞0．05）；各组江南白鹅的死淘率差异不显著（P＞0．05），Ⅲ、Ⅳ组江南白鹅的死淘率略低于Ⅰ、Ⅱ组，Ⅲ组江南白鹅的死淘率低于Ⅳ组；各组屠宰性能无显著差异（ P＞0.05）。[结论]舍内网架＋舍外运动场＋小水池的饲养模式是较理想的饲养方式，可进行推广应用。
Abstract
Objective] The aim was to compare goose production performance under different feeding modes.[Method] 3 600 geese were randomly divided into 4 groups, adopting four treatments including the inner ground +outside the stadium +river(Ⅰgroup), inner ground+outside the stadium +small pools(Ⅱgroup) , inner network frame +outside the stadium+river(Ⅲ group) , inner network frame +outside the stadium+small pools(Ⅳ group) , effects of different feeding modes on the productive performance and slaughter performance of Jiangnan goose were studied.[ Result] The weight of Jiangnan goose in inner network frame +outside the stadium+river(Ⅲ group) was significantly higher than that in other groups(P<0.05), while there was no significant difference(P>0.05) when they were on the market;the dead rate of Jiangnan goose in each group was no significant difference(P>0.05), the dead rate of goose in Ⅲ and Ⅳ group was slightly lower thanⅠ, Ⅱ group, the dead rate of goose in Ⅲ groups was lower than Ⅳ group; there was no significant difference of slaughter performance in each group(P>0.05).[Conclusion] The inner network frame +outside the stadium, small pools of feed pattern is a more ideal way of breeding, which can be applied to the actual feed.
基金项目
国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD39B0405)
国家现代水禽产业技术体系专项(CARS－43－27)
江苏省财政项目农业三新工程项目(［SXGC2015076］)
鹅产业化发展关键技术研究示范项目(［CX151008］)
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
维普
万方数据