安徽农业科学2016,Vol.44Issue(30) :236-238,254.

土地整治项目灌溉渠道衬砌方案经济比选研究

Research on Economic Scheme Comparison of Irrigation Canal about Land Consolidation Project

岳小松
安徽农业科学2016,Vol.44Issue(30) :236-238,254.

土地整治项目灌溉渠道衬砌方案经济比选研究

Research on Economic Scheme Comparison of Irrigation Canal about Land Consolidation Project

岳小松1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 江西省煤田地质局测绘大队,江西南昌330001
  • 折叠

摘要

灌溉渠道是农田重要的基础设施,而渠床渗漏是渠系水量损失的主要途径,渠道衬砌可减少渠床渗漏损失,提高灌溉效益。不同的衬砌方案效益各不相同,通过对相同流量、不同断面和不同衬砌方式的渠道进行单价分析,考察较适宜的衬砌方案。结果表明,3种断面中梯形断面渠道单价最低;矩形断面渠道单价次之,U型断面渠道单价最高。5种衬砌方式中,梯形断面边坡预制渠道单价最低,预制U型槽单价最高。

Abstract

Irrigation channel is an important infrastructure of farmland , leakage of canal bed is the main way of water loss , lining can reduce leakage loss and improve irrigation efficiency.By studying irrigation canal unit cost ahout the same discharge with different section and lining fashion, the results showed:in three sections, the trapezoidal cross section irrigation canal unit cost was lowest, the rectangular cross section irri-gation canal took second place, the U-shaped cross section irrigation canal unit cost was highest.Among five lining fashion, the trapezoidal cross section with slope prefabricated irrigation canal unit cost was lowest , the U-shaped cross section with prefabricated irrigation canal unit cost was highest.

关键词

梯形断面/矩形断面/U型断面/现浇/预制/砖砌

Key words

Trapezoidal cross section/Rectangular cross section/U-shaped cross section/Cast-in-situ/Prefabricate/Brick

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2016
安徽农业科学
安徽省农业科学院

安徽农业科学

影响因子:0.413
ISSN:0517-6611
被引量2
参考文献量3
段落导航相关论文