首页|基于3种富营养化评价方法的锦江河水质风险评估

基于3种富营养化评价方法的锦江河水质风险评估

扫码查看
以铜仁市锦江河为例,采集并分析水体理化指标,运用卡尔森营养状态指数(TSI)、修正的营养状态指数(TSIM)、综合营养状态指数(TLI)3种方法评价其锦江河水体营养富化水平,并且通过数理统计分析方法,分析不同评价方法之间的差异以及环境因子对评价方法的影响.结果表明:评价方法不同,导致水体富营养化评价结果不同,锦江河水体按照TSI、TSIM和TLI评价方法,其结果分别为贫营养、富营养和中营养水平.单因素方差分析表明,TSIM与TSI和TLI差异显著(P<0.05),TSI与TLI差异不显著(P>0.05);相关分析表明,Chl-a与TSI、TSIM呈现显著正相关(P<0.05),TN和TP与TLI呈现显著正相关(P<0.05).TSI和TSIM主要表征藻类的生长状况,TLI则更加专注于氮和磷水平.综合而言,相较于TSI和TSIM法,TLI采用多种环境因子的加权方式,更能科学地反映水体的富营养化状态.
Risk Assessment of Water Quality in Jinjiang River Based on Three Nutrient Enrichment Evaluation Methods
Taking Jinjiang River in Tongren City as an example,the physicochemical indicators of the water body were collected and analyzed.Three methods,Carlson's trophic state index(TSI),modified trophic state index(TSIM)and trophic level index(TLI),were used to evalu-ate the nutrient enrichment level in Jinjiang River water.Mathematical statistical analysis was used to examine differences between the different evaluation methods and the influence of environmental factors on them.The results showed that different evaluation methods lead to different re-sults in eutrophication assessment of water bodies.According to TSI,TSIM and TLI evaluation methods,the results of Jinjiang River water body were assessed as having oligotrophic,eutrophic and mesotrophic conditions,respectively.Single-factor analysis of variance showed that a significant difference between TSIM and TSI/TLI(P<0.05),while no significant difference was observed between TSI and TLI(P>0.05).Correlation analysis showed Chl-a was significantly positively correlated with TSI and TSIM(P<0.05),while TN and TP were significantly positively correlated with TLI(P<0.05).TSI and TSIM mainly characterized the growth status of algae,while TLI focused more on nitrogen and phosphorus levels.Overall,compared to TSI and TSIM methods,TLI adopted a weighted approach of multiple environmental factors,which could more scientifically reflect the eutrophication status of water bodies.

EutrophicationEvaluation methodWater qualityRisk assessmentJinjiang River

张友、郭子栋、李干蓉、强小燕、田丹

展开 >

铜仁职业技术学院,贵州铜仁 554300

富营养化 评价方法 水质 风险评估 锦江河

2024

安徽农业科学
安徽省农业科学院

安徽农业科学

影响因子:0.413
ISSN:0517-6611
年,卷(期):2024.52(22)