首页|体制、交际与猜疑:论1933-1935年华北对日交涉

体制、交际与猜疑:论1933-1935年华北对日交涉

扫码查看
长城抗战结束后,国民政府构建了以政整会和军分会为主体的地方交涉体制,其运行为中央对日交涉创造了回旋余地.但在日方多头交涉的重压下,两会体制举步维艰,最终黯然退场,华北交涉之责收归中央.黄郛等人一度借助私人交际缓和中日关系,但多方交涉之弊亦迅速显现.且私人交际清晰地反映出中日权势强弱关系,地位的不对等反为日方索求打开了便利之门.这一时期的中日交涉始终在高度猜嫌的氛围下进行,信任危机加剧了双方的立场分歧,而激进化手段的采取又反过来助长了猜嫌心理,中日关系在恶性循环中滑向谷底.然而,全面抗战爆发前的日本侵华活动具有清晰的连贯性,日方对中方"诚意"的无理诉求基于一种荒谬的认知逻辑.
System,Diplomacy,and Suspicion:A Study of Sino-Japanese Negotiations in North China,1933-1935
After the conclusion of the Great Wall Resistance,the Nationalist government established a local negotiation system centered around the Political Reform Committee and the Military Subcommittee,which provided the central government with a degree of maneuverability in its negotiations with Japan.However,under the pressure of Japan's multi-faceted diplo-matic approach,this dual-committee system struggled to function effectively and was eventually sidelined,with responsibility for negotiations in North China being reassigned to the central government.Figures such as Huang Fu briefly utilized private di-plomacy to ease Sino-Japanese relations,yet the inherent flaws of this multi-layered negotiation system quickly became ap-parent.Moreover,private diplomacy clearly reflected the asymmetric power dynamics between China and Japan,with Japan's dominant position enabling its demands.Sino-Japanese negotiations during this period unfolded in a climate of intense suspi-cion,and the resulting crisis of trust further exacerbated the divergence in their respective positions.The adoption of increasing-ly radical measures,in turn,intensified this mutual distrust,plunging Sino-Japanese relations into a vicious cycle.Neverthe-less,Japan's activities in the years leading up to the full-scale War of Resistance against Japan demonstrated a clear continu-ity,and Japan's unreasonable demands for China's"sincerity"were rooted in an absurd logic of perception.

Sino-Japanese negotiationsNorth China Incidentdual-committee systemdiplomacysuspicion

徐进

展开 >

山东大学 历史学院,山东 济南 250100

中日交涉 华北事变 两会体制 交际 猜疑

2025

安徽史学
安徽省社会科学院

安徽史学

北大核心
影响因子:0.35
ISSN:1005-605X
年,卷(期):2025.(1)