首页|基于2024版C-NCAP正面100%重叠刚性壁障碰撞的Q3假人伤害分析

基于2024版C-NCAP正面100%重叠刚性壁障碰撞的Q3假人伤害分析

扫码查看
通过对35 个C-NCAP 2024 版正面100%重叠刚性壁障碰撞试验中Q3 假人的伤害数据进行统计,对比分析了不同车型、不同儿童座椅安装方向、不同儿童座椅安装方式下 Q3 假人伤害情况和原因.结果表明:C-NCAP 2024 版与2021 版相比,Q3 假人平均得分率降低11.5%,且头部和胸部得分率降低明显;不同车型下Q3假人平均得分率与该车型的平均OLC呈负相关,A、B级轿车平均得分率较高,中型和小型SUV平均得分率较低;Q3 假人后向安装的平均得分率略高于前向安装;安全带类安装方式下Q3 假人的平均得分率为 88.5%,且使用数量占比最多,ISOFIX类安装方式的Q3 假人平均得分率仅为 60.7%,其他半通用类安装方式的平均得分率为78.9%.
Injury Analysis of Q3 Dummy in Frontal 100% Overlap Rigid Barrier Impact Based on C-NCAP 2024
Through statistical analysis of the injury data of Q3 dummies in 35 C-NCAP 2024 100%frontal overlap rigid barrier crash tests,the injury conditions and causes of Q3 dummies in different vehicle models,different child restraint system installation directions and different child restraint system installation methods were compared and analyzed.The results showed that:C-NCAP 2024 version compared to C-NCAP 2021 version,the average score rate of Q3 dummy decreased by 11.5%,and the score rate of head and chest decreased significantly;The average score rate of Q3 dummy under different models is negatively correlated with the average OLC of this model.The average score rate of A and B sedans is higher,while the average score rate of medium and small SUV is lower.The average score rate of Q3 Dummies slightly higher with a backward installation than with a forward installation;The average score rate of Q3 dummies for seat belt installation was 88.5%,and the number of uses accounted for the largest proportion,the average score rate of ISOFIX installation was only 60.7%,and the average score rate of other semi-universal installation methods was 78.9%.

Q3 DummyC-NCAPscoring rateinjury analysischild restraint system

徐哲、高冠宇、刘灿灿

展开 >

中汽研汽车检验中心(天津)有限公司,天津 300300

Q3假人 C-NCAP 得分率 伤害分析 儿童座椅

2024

车辆与动力技术
中国兵工学会

车辆与动力技术

影响因子:0.287
ISSN:1009-4687
年,卷(期):2024.(4)