首页|基于专用目标的中原牡丹品种评价与筛选

基于专用目标的中原牡丹品种评价与筛选

扫码查看
调查了196个中原牡丹品种的形态与观赏性状,针对园林绿化、盆花与切花生产3种专用目标,采用灰色系统理论,通过与标准品种关联度分析,进行品种评价与筛选.结果表明:针对园林绿化,适宜选择与标准品种关联度≥0.7的品种;而对盆花与切花栽培而言,与标准品种关联度≥0.8的品种较为适合.据此筛选出45个品种(约占总数的1/4)推荐在生产中应用,包括42个绿化品种、20个盆栽品种、12个切花品种.推荐品种中有7个可同时满足绿化、盆栽和切花生产的要求,应在生产中优先推广;有15个品种在适合绿化应用的同时,也可用于盆花或切花栽培;有3个与20个品种分别适合盆栽与绿化的单一应用目标.其余151个品种(约占总品种数3/4)的评价结果不理想,不提倡大规模用于生产.
Cultivar evaluation and selection in Paeonia × suffruticosa Zhongyuan Group for specialized purpose to use
Based on the investigation on morphological and ornamental characteristics of 196 cultivars in Paeonia × suffruticosa Zhongyuan Group,an analysis on the correlation degree with the standard cultivar (SC) by grey system theory was carried out to evaluate and select cultivars for three different specialized purposes,landscaping,potted-plant and cut-flower production.The results showed that,the cultivars had a correlation degree over 0.7 to SC can be selected to propagate for landscaping,and ones had a correlation degree over 0.8 to SC can be selected for potted-plants and cut-flower cultivation.According to the conclusion above,45 cultivars out of 196 investigated ones were recommended for production application,including 42 for landscaping,20 for potted-plants and 12 for cut-flowers.Among all the recommended ones,7 cultivars had the priority in production because they can meet all the requirements of landscaping,potted-plant and cut-flower production simultaneously.Fifteen cultivars were suited for landscaping as well as for potted-plant or cut-flower production.Three and 20 cultivars were only suited for potted-plant and landscaping respectively.Only a quarter of the total cultivars were selected,and the rest 151 were not well suited for mass production due to their unsatisfactory evaluation results.

tree peonymorphological characteristicscultivar evaluationcultivar selection

高平、刘玉英、成仿云、刘改秀、李敏

展开 >

北京林业大学园林学院

中国洛阳国家牡丹基因库

牡丹 形态特征 品种评价 品种筛选

"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目

2012BAD01B0704

2013

北京林业大学学报
北京林业大学

北京林业大学学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.237
ISSN:1000-1522
年,卷(期):2013.35(4)
  • 11
  • 5