首页|已公开个人信息的刑法保护界限

已公开个人信息的刑法保护界限

扫码查看
未经同意处理已公开个人信息是否构成犯罪在司法实务中存在争议.既有理论中,二次授权说违反法秩序统一原则,也过度限制了个人信息的合理运用;信息开放程度说则使知情同意的判断沦为形式.基于弱同意说,若未经同意的信息处理行为符合自愿公开个人信息的用途或情境,便是在合理范围内处理个人信息,因而不够成犯罪;即便不符合,只要信息主体未表示明确拒绝且未损害其重大利益,便不具有可罚的违法性因而不构成犯罪.由于依法必须公开的个人信息涉及公共利益,只要信息处理行为不以违法犯罪为目的便不应构成犯罪.对已公开个人信息的刑法保护需要侧重于打击非法使用个人信息的行为,为此应将其犯罪化.
Criminal Law Protection Limits for Publicly Available Personal Information
There is a controversy in judicial practice:whether the unauthorized processing of publicly available personal information constitutes a crime.In existing theories,the secondary authorization argument violates the principle of legal order unification and excessively restricts the reasonable use of personal information,while the information openness argument reduces the informed consent to a mere formality.Based on the weak consent argument,if the unauthorized processing of information aligns with the voluntary disclosure purposes or contexts of personal information,it falls within the reasonable scope of personal information processing and therefore does not constitute a crime.Even if it does not align,as long as the data subject has not explicitly refused and his or her significant interests are not harmed,it lacks the punishable illegality and thus does not constitute a crime.Considering that the disclosure of personal information mandated by law involves public interests,as long as the information processing is not aimed at illegal activities,it should not be deemed criminal.The criminal protection of publicly available personal information should focus on combating the illegal use of such information,and therefore,it should be criminalized.

disclosed personal informationinformed consentcrime of violating citizens'personal informationright to self-determination of personal information

彭赛嘉

展开 >

北京师范大学,北京 100091

已公开个人信息 知情同意 侵犯公民个人信息罪 个人信息自决权

北京师范大学法学院学术型研究生专项科研基金

2022LAW005

2024

北京警察学院学报
北京警官学院

北京警察学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.282
ISSN:2095-5758
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 34