首页|认罪认罚被追诉人反悔权的保障——正向规范路径与反向排除模式

认罪认罚被追诉人反悔权的保障——正向规范路径与反向排除模式

扫码查看
反悔权旨在为被追诉人提供一个依其单方意志消灭控辩合意法律效果的救济机会,其保护的事项范围包括实体性和程序性两重维度,上诉是其重要的行为方式.反悔权体现了"公正优先、凸显效率"的诉讼价值观,是保证认罪认罚理智性和自愿性的关键所在.未来应当从实体法、程序法和证据法三个角度建构反悔权的保障性规范;建构限制性规范时应当重点运用比例原则审查其合宪性,具体可以采用"反向排除模式"归纳带有权利滥用性质的上诉情形并以此作为反悔权滥用的认定标准,进而为这类上诉案件设置二审非全面审查的快速处理机制.
The Justification and Protection of the Right of Rescission of the Accused Person to Confess Crime and Punishment
The right of rescission aims to provide the defendant with an opportunity to eliminate the legal effect of the agreement of prosecution and defense according to his unilateral will. The scope of its protection includes both substantive and procedural dimensions,and appeal is an important way of its behavior. The right of rescission has a deep constitutional foundation,embodies the litigation values of "justice first,highlighting efficiency",and is the key to ensure the rational and voluntary punishment of guilty plea. In the future,we should construct the guarantee standard of rescission from three angles:substantive law,procedural law and evidence law. In the construction of restrictive norms,we should focus on applying the principle of proportionality to examine its constitutionality. Specifically,we can use the "reverse exclusion mode" to summarize the appeals with the nature of right abuse and take it as the identification standard of the abuse of the right of rescission,so as to set up a quick processing mechanism for the second instance of such appeals without comprehensive review.

right of rescissionthe system of pleading guilty and accepting punishmentright of appealvoluntariness

郭运帷

展开 >

吉林大学,长春 130012

反悔权 认罪认罚从宽制度 上诉权 自愿性

国家社会科学基金重大项目

18ZDA139

2024

北京警察学院学报
北京警官学院

北京警察学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.282
ISSN:2095-5758
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 15