基于Web of Science和CNKI数据库，运用CiteSpace、VOSviewer等计量分析软件系统梳理过去43年间中外关于冬奥会的理论研究，客观呈现中外在冬奥学术舞台上的现实处境和话语地位，为新时代我国加强冬奥学术话语体系构建提供参考。研究发现:1)国外的冬奥学术成果融合了多学科的知识体系和思想内容、中国则是体育单一学科撑起了冬奥理论研究的半边天;2)以欧美为代表的西方国家之间、研究机构之间、研究团体之间等建立了网状结构的合作关系，中国的研究机构、团体等对外和对内合作的连线相较稀疏，跨机构、跨区域、跨领域的交流和协同尚不足;3)中国关于冬奥会的理论研究在路径上异于国外、在主题上同步国外、在影响力上低于国外;4)国外的冬奥研究轨迹和路径变化呈现出"由点及线到面"的特征，中国则呈现出"由远及近、由外及里"的演变特征，前者蹚出了一条内生式构建冬奥知识体系的路子，后者开拓出了一条由"域外借鉴"向"自主探索"方向前进的冬奥研究之路。对未来中国冬奥研究的建议:1)接续输出北京冬奥会上的"中国成果";2)接续提升我国冬奥竞技实力的国际地位;3)接续探索冬奥理论成果传播的多元化方式。
1980-2023:Review and Comment on the Theoretical Research of the Winter Olympics at Home and Abroad
Based on the Web of Science and CNKI database,bibliometric analysis software systems such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to sort out the theoretical research on the Winter Olympics between China and foreign countries over the past 43 years,objectively presents the realistic situation and discourse status of China and foreign countries on the academic stage of the Winter Olympics,and provides a reference for strengthening the con-struction of China's academic discourse system of the Winter Olympics in the new era.The research findings are as follows:1)The academic achievements of the Winter Olympics in foreign countries integrate the knowledge system and ideological content of multiple disciplines,while in China,the single discipline of sports holds up half of the theoretical research of the Winter Olympics;2)Western countries represented by Europe and the United States have established a network of cooperative relations among research institutions and research groups.Chinese research institutions and groups have relatively few connections for external and internal cooperation,and cross-in-stitutional,cross-regional and cross-field communication and collaboration are still insufficient;3)China's"Winter Olympics research"is different from foreign countries in terms of path,is synchronized with foreign countries in terms of topics,and is less influential than foreign countries.4)Foreign Winter Olympics research track and path changes show the characteristics of"from the point and line to the surface",while China shows the evolution char-acteristics of"from far to near,from outside to inside".The former has blazed a path of endogenous construction of Winter Olympics knowledge system,while the latter has opened up a way of Winter Olympics research from"learn-ing from outside"to"independent exploration".Suggestions for future research of Winter Olympics in China:1)Continue to export"China's achievements"in the Beijing Winter Olympics;2)Continuously enhance China's inter-national status in terms of athletic strength in the Winter Olympics;3)Continue to explore the diversified ways to disseminate dissemination of theoretical achievements of the Winter Olympics.
the Winter OlympicsBeijing Winter OlympicsChinese and foreign studiesresearch reviewIce and snow sports
万方数据
