首页|何谓"自我保存"?——斯宾诺莎论"Conatus"与有限样式的本质和存在

何谓"自我保存"?——斯宾诺莎论"Conatus"与有限样式的本质和存在

扫码查看
斯宾诺莎的"conatus"(努力)学说是涉及其形而上学、伦理学和政治哲学的重要理论。然而,学界对于这一理论有一个误解,即认为斯宾诺莎在赋予理性和非理性的个体同等的自我保存的权利时,给其哲学体系带来了无法克服的矛盾:非理性的个体保存的是其个体生命,理性的个体追求的是德性和自由,对德性和自由的追求意味着对生命本身的忽视。由于二者是同等的自然权利,斯宾诺莎在肯定生命与取消生命的权利之间无法进行弥合。文章通过对有限样式的本质和存在的分析,指出无论是理性的自我保存还是非理性的自我保存,保存的都是个体的特殊本质的存在。因此二者之间的区别是自我保存的力量大小之间的区别,同时也是自然权利大小之间的区别,而非保存对象的区别。斯宾诺莎对理性的自我保存的强调,不是要实现传统哲学超脱肉体和世界的灵魂不朽的目的,而是为了更有德性地生活在现实世界之中。
What is"Self-preservation"?——Spinoza on"Conatus"and the Essence and Existence of Finite Modes
Spinoza's"conatus"theory is an important theory involving his metaphysics,ethics and political philosophy.However,scholars have a misunderstanding regarding this theory,that is,when Spinoza grants rational and irrational individuals the same right of self-preservation,it brings an insurmountable contradiction to the system of his philosophy:the irrational individual preserves his individual life,while the rational individual pursues virtue and freedom,which implies ignoring life it-self.Since the two are equal natural rights,Spinoza cannot bridge the gap between the right to affirm life and the right to cancel it.Through the analysis of the essence and existence of finite modes,this article points out that whether it is rational self-preservation or irrational self-preservation,what is preserved is the existence of the individual's special essence.Therefore,the difference between the two is the difference in the strength of self preservation,as well as the difference in the magnitude of natural rights,not the difference in the objects of preservation.Spinoza's emphasizing rational self-preservation,is not to achieve the immortality of the soul that transcend the body and the world,which is the ideal of traditional philosophy,but to live in the real world.

self-preservationreasonessenceexistencethe eternity of the mind

雷泌阳

展开 >

同济大学人文学院,上海 200433

自我保存 理性 本质 存在 心灵永恒

2024

宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)
宝鸡文理学院

宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.168
ISSN:1008-4193
年,卷(期):2024.44(1)
  • 14