首页|"立标以明道":张载的理本论及其张力

"立标以明道":张载的理本论及其张力

扫码查看
张载重气,程、朱对此屡有微词。现代学者因此将张载理学归为气本论,认为与程朱理本论有根本不同。这或有过度解读之嫌,既没能照顾到程、朱批评的微妙之处,也无法照应张载学说自身存在的张力。二程"立标以明道"一语,既从"明道"的角度肯定了张载思想的理本论底色,也从"立标"的角度对其做了微妙的批评。以此语为线索可以发现:张载思想在以理本论为底色的同时,由于重气之宗旨,引发了向气本论滑转的可能,为理学史中"气"的本体化留下了思想空间。
"Establishing Standards to Clarify the Way":Zhang Zai's Li-based Theory and Its Tension
Zhangzai lays too much stress on"qi",Cheng and Zhu repeatedly expressed their dis-satisfaction with this.Modern scholars therefore classify Zhangzai's Neo-Confucianism as the"qi"-based theory,believing that it is fundamentally different from Cheng and Zhu's Neo-Confucianism.This may be suspected of over-interpretation,as it fails to take into account the subtleties of Cheng and Zhu's criticism and fails to address the inherent tension of Zhangzai's theory.The phrase"estab-lishing standards to clarify the way"by Chengzai not only affirms the theoretical foundation of Zhang-zai's thought from the perspective of"clarifying the way",but also makes subtle criticisms of Zhangzai from the perspective of"establishing standards".Taking this statement as a clue,it can be found that Zhang Zai's thought,while based on the principle-based theory,also had the potential to shift towards the"qi"-based theory due to his emphasis on"qi"leaving room for the"qi"-based theory in the history of Neo-Confucianism.

Zhang Zaiestablishing a standardclarify the way"li"-based theory

张传海

展开 >

宝鸡文理学院政法学院,陕西宝鸡 721013

张载 立标 明道 理本论

2024

宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)
宝鸡文理学院

宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.168
ISSN:1008-4193
年,卷(期):2024.44(5)