首页|固相凝集法和酶联免疫吸附试验检测血小板输注无效患者血小板自身抗体的对比研究

固相凝集法和酶联免疫吸附试验检测血小板输注无效患者血小板自身抗体的对比研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨固相凝集法(solid-phase agglutination,SPA)和酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)(PAKAUTO试剂盒)检测血小板输注无效(platelet transfusion refractoriness,PTR)患者血小板自身抗体的特点和一致性.方法 选取2021年7月至2023年9月北京市红十字血液中心血小板抗体筛查结果为阳性且无法判定为血小板特异性抗体的PTR患者20例,采用SPA和ELISA(PAKAUTO试剂盒)分别进行血小板自身抗体检测;采用荧光PCR熔解曲线法进行人类血小板抗原(human platelet antigen,HPA)基因型分型检测.结果 20例患者中,男7例,女13例,年龄7~83岁,平均(50.5±20.0)岁.SPA检测血小板自身抗体阳性率为100%,均为结合型;ELISA(PAKAUTO试剂盒)检测阳性率为95%(19/20),其中结合型16例、游离型14例,两种方法检测血小板自身抗体阳性率的比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).抗GPⅠb/Ⅸ抗体是最多的结合型自身抗体(80.0%),抗GPⅠa/Ⅱa抗体是最多的游离型自身抗体(70.0%).结合HPA基因型分型检测结果,患者产生的抗体中均包含针对HPA-5a的自身抗体.结论 SPA和ELISA(PAKAUTO试剂盒)检测PTR患者血小板自身抗体一致性较高,ELISA(PAKAUTO试剂盒)能区分出不同的抗体特异性及分布情况;SPA简便易行,在早期诊断方面更能体现其应用价值.
A comparative study of platelet autoantibodies in patients with platelet transfusion refractoriness detected by solid-phase agglutination and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Objective To explore the characteristics and consistency of platelet autoantibodies detected by solid-phase agglutination(SPA)and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)(PAKAUTO kit)in patients with platelet transfusion refractoriness(PTR).Methods A total of 20 PTR patients with positive platelet antibody screening results and could not be determined to have platelet-specific antibodies in Beijing Red Cross Blood Center from July 2021 to September 2023 were selected.Platelet autoantibodies were detected by SPA and ELISA(PAKAUTO kit).Human platelet antigen(HPA)genotyping was performed by fluorescence PCR melting curve analysis.Results Among the 20 patients,there were seven males and 13 females,aged from 7 to 83 years,with an average of(50.5±20.0)years.The positive rate of platelet autoantibodies detected by SPA was 100%,all of which were of the combined type.The positive rate detected by ELISA(PAKAUTO kit)was 95%(19/20),with 16 cases of combined type and 14 cases of free type.There was no statistically significant difference in the positive rates of platelet autoantibodies detected by the two methods(P>0.05).Anti-GPⅠb/Ⅸantibodies was the most common combined autoantibodies(80.0%),and anti-GPⅠa/Ⅱa antibodies was the most common free autoantibodies(70.0%).Combined with HPA genotyping results,the antibodies produced by patients all included autoantibodies against HPA-5a.Conclusions SPA and ELISA(PAKAUTO kit)have a high consistency in detecting platelet autoantibodies in PTR patients,and ELISA(PAKAUTO kit)can distinguish different antibody specificities and distribution,while SPA is simple and easy to perform and is more valuable in early diagnosis.

platelet autoantibodyplatelet transfusion refractoriness(PTR)solid-phase agglutination(SPA)enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)

温玉洁、范成艳、张丹、廉雪、刘娜、孙铁成、王丽君、贾延军、李冬妹

展开 >

100088 北京市红十字血液中心HLA实验室

血小板自身抗体 血小板输注无效 固相凝集法 酶联免疫吸附试验

2024

北京医学
中华医学会北京分会

北京医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.714
ISSN:0253-9713
年,卷(期):2024.46(10)