首页|不同情形下GNSS/INS组合导航系统精度分析

不同情形下GNSS/INS组合导航系统精度分析

扫码查看
基于载波相位差分的GNSS/INS组合导航系统在移动测绘领域应用广泛,但其精度也由于卫星观测条件、IMU级别、滤波算法和处理软件等因素而相差较大,对测绘作业和成果精度评定造成阻碍.针对上述问题,利用设计的跑车实验,详细分析了不同软件、不同级别IMU、不同处理模式、不同环境等条件下组合导航参数的精度.结果表明,在卫星观测条件良好的情况下,不同软件和不同处理模式的解算精度相当;由消费级到战术级再到近导航级,精度逐渐提高,其中消费级IMU组合导航的姿态中的航向精度为660″、横滚和俯仰精度为 60″、速度精度为 2.5 cm/s、3D位置精度为 3 cm.在城市路段,精度整体上均有下降但仍在同一量级;当卫星数不足 4 颗时,紧组合定位精度会下降到m级.
Accuracy Analysis of Several Common GNSS/INS Integrated Navigation System under Different Conditions
GNSS/INS integrated navigation system based on carrier phase difference is widely used in the field of mobile surveying and mapping,but the precision of integrated navigation parameters is greatly different because of satellite observation conditions,IMU level,filtering algorithm and processing software,which hinders the ac-curaies assessment of surveying and mapping operations and results.Aiming at the above problems,the precisions of integrated navigation parameters under different software,IMU levels,processing modes and environments are analyzed in detail by using the designed sports car experiment.The results show that the accuracies of different software and different processing modes are equal under good satellite observation conditions.From consumer level to tactical level and then to near navigation level,the navigation accuracy improvs gradually.Among them,the at-titude accuracy of consumer level IMU integrated navigation is 660″,roll and pitch accuracy is 60″,speed accura-cy is 2.5 cm/s,3D position accuracy is 3 cm.In urban areas,the accuracies of navigation parameters decreases on the whole,but the decrease is still in the same order.When the number of satellites is less than 4,the precision of tight combination positioning will decrease to meter level.

GNSSINSprocessing softwareIMU levelprocessing modeaccuracy analysis

吴庆、刘长建、肖国锐、胡小华、李崇辉

展开 >

信息工程大学,河南 郑州 450001

地理信息工程国家重点实验室,陕西 西安 710054

全球导航卫星系统 惯性导航系统 处理软件 IMU级别 处理模式 精度分析

2024

测绘科学技术学报
信息工程大学科研部

测绘科学技术学报

影响因子:0.594
ISSN:1673-6338
年,卷(期):2024.40(4)