首页|规划管制下土地发展机会差别对农村家庭收入的影响——以武汉市蔡甸区为例

规划管制下土地发展机会差别对农村家庭收入的影响——以武汉市蔡甸区为例

扫码查看
城镇开发与生态保护等规划管制引致土地发展机会的不平等会影响农村家庭收入,这是客观存在的事实,然缺乏量化研究.测度分解出规划管制下土地发展机会差别对微观家庭收入带来的影响,可为构建国土空间规划配套政策破解规划衍生的区域发展不平衡提供参考依据.选取武汉市蔡甸区的中法生态新城与消泗乡作为城镇开发和湿地保护的典型区,2021年随机抽样调查了 573户农村家庭,运用倾向得分匹配、中介效应等方法揭示土地发展机会差别对农村家庭收入的影响.研究表明:(1)城镇开发区土地的非农发展机会对农村家庭总收入、本地务工收入和转移性收入均有显著正向影响,ATT估计值分别为0.112、1.014和0.254,城镇开发经济产业集聚增加村民就业机会,对人力资本质低但量多农村家庭的工资性收入提升有显著的正向效应;(2)劳动力配置在土地非农开发机会影响农村家庭工资性收入的过程中发挥着中介效应,家庭务工人数占比的中介效应为0.116,且在1%水平上显著;(3)相较于湿地保护区,城镇开发区农村家庭的内部收入差距相对较小,主要原因是土地开发带动低收入家庭的工资性收入增长,且对农耕收入的负向影响低于高收入家庭.建议构建土地开发利得向生态保护及农业耕作区转移的共建共享机制,以实现规划管制区与非管制区之间土地增值的分享.
Impacts of Land Development Opportunities Under Planning Regulation on Rural Household Income:A Case Study of Caidian District,Wuhan
It's an objective fact that imbalanced land development opportunities induced by planning regulation,such as urban development and ecological protection,undoubtedly differentiate rural household income.However,there is a lack of quantitative measurement.Measuring and decomposing the impacts of land development opportunities on rural household income can support policies of territorial spatial planning to rectify the imbalanced regional development that may be caused by planning.The Sino-French Ecological New Town and Xiaosi Township in Caidian District of Wuhan City are typical areas for urban development and wetland protection,where we surveyed 573 rural households by random sampling in 2021.The impacts of land development opportunities on rural household income were examined by propensity score matching and mediation effect model.The results showed that,firstly,the non-agricultural development opportunities of land in urban development zones had a significantly positive impact on the total income,local wage income,and transfer income of rural household.The estimated ATT values were 0.112,1.014,and 0.254,respectively.Urban development and its economic agglomeration increased the household non-farm employment.The promotion effect of land development opportunities on farmers'wage income was more significant for high-quantity,and low-quality households.Secondly,the allocation of household labor force intermediated the effect of land non-agricultural development opportunities on household income.The mediating effect of the proportion of household workers was 0.116,which was significant at the 1%level.Thirdly,compared to the wetland reserve,the income gaps in the urban development zones were smaller.The main reason was that the land development opportunities promoted the wage income growth of low-income household,and the negative impact on farming income was lower than that of high-income household.It was suggested to establish a co-construction and sharing mechanism for transferring added land value of land development to ecological protection and agricultural farming areas,so as to realize the sharing of land value increments between restricted and unrestricted development zones.

land development opportunitiesincome gapurban development zonewetland reserverural household

田霞、蔡银莺

展开 >

华中农业大学公共管理学院,武汉 430070

土地发展机会 收入差距 城镇开发区 湿地保护区 农村家庭

国家自然科学基金项目国家自然科学基金项目中央高校基本科研业务费专项

72374080719740682662023GGPY001

2024

长江流域资源与环境
中国科学院资源环境科学与技术局 中国科学院武汉文献情报中心

长江流域资源与环境

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.35
ISSN:1004-8227
年,卷(期):2024.33(1)
  • 46