首页|无障碍环境利益是否为权利?——基于实证与概念证成标准的分析

无障碍环境利益是否为权利?——基于实证与概念证成标准的分析

扫码查看
《无障碍环境建设法》的实施并不意味着无障碍环境利益已经成为一项法定的个体权利.利用实证与概念标准进行检视可知,尽管无障碍环境利益能够满足实证标准,但它的公共利益属性决定了其欠缺对应的关联性义务,不满足概念标准中的个人选择保护判断标准,因而不宜将无障碍环境利益视为一项个体权利.这不妨碍对无障碍环境利益提供必要的法律保护.为此,可基于权利束理论构建"个体-社会-国家"的保障结构,同时结合其公共利益属性和人权属性,助推社会成员投诉权、公益诉讼以及人权保护等方面的发展.
Is the Benefit of an Accessible Environment a Right?An Analysis Based on Empirical and Conceptual Justification Standards
The implementation of the Law on the Construction of an Accessible Environment does not imply that the benefits of an accessible environment have become a statutory individual right.An examination using empirical and conceptual standards reveals that,although the benefits of an accessible environment meet empirical standards,their nature as a public interest dictates that they lack the corresponding relational obligations.Therefore,they do not meet the standard of individual choice protection within the conceptual standards and should not be considered as an individual right.This,however,does not preclude the provision of necessary legal protection for the benefits of an accessible environment.To this end,an individual-society-state protection structure can be constructed based on the bundle of rights theory.This structure,combined with the public interest and human rights attributes of the benefits of an accessible environment,can promote the development of the right to lodge complaints,public interest litigation,and human rights protection among social members.

The right to an accessible environmentRight justificationEmpirical and conceptual standardsBundle of rightsHuman rights protection

石小巍

展开 >

北京大学法学院 北京 100871

无障碍环境权 权利证成 实证与概念标准 权利束 人权保障

2024

残疾人研究
残疾人事业发展研究会

残疾人研究

CSSCICHSSCD
影响因子:0.615
ISSN:2095-0810
年,卷(期):2024.(5)