首页|多种铝生产方式的碳核算与减碳潜力分析

多种铝生产方式的碳核算与减碳潜力分析

扫码查看
依据不同氧化铝生产工艺和电力结构,构建了6种铝的生产方式,并基于生命周期理念,对这6种方式的CO2排放量进行核算并分析产生差异的原因;同时,设置了不同的低碳路径,挖掘铝工业的减碳潜力。结果表明:生产1 t铝的CO2排放量,拜耳-水电法最小,为1。86×103 kg,烧结-火电法最大,为1。20×104 kg;在同种电力结构下,化石燃料、电力和阳极等原料的输入量是影响氧化铝和电解铝生产工序中CO2排放量的主要因素;在氧化铝生产工艺一致的情况下,用水电替代火电可使铝生产过程中的CO2排放量降低34%~43%。由减碳路径分析结果可知,绿色电力-清洁工艺(EGP-CP)路径下CO2减排效果最好,每生产1 t铝的CO2排放量可降低至7。75×103 kg,比基准路径(BAU)减少15。68%。
Carbon accounting and reduction potential analysis of various aluminum production methods
This study is based on the life cycle concept,CO2 emission of six aluminum production methods constructed from aluminum production processes and power structures was calculated,and the reasons for the variance were analyzed.At the same time,different low-carbon paths were set to dig into the carbon reduction potential of aluminum industry.The result showed that:the Bayer process-hydropower method had the least CO2 emissions per ton of aluminum and the sinter process-thermal power method had the most CO2 emissions per ton of aluminum,which were 1.86 × 103 kg and 1.20 × 104 kg,respectively.With the same power structure,different inputs of fossil fuels,electricity,alumina,and other raw materials were the main factors affecting CO2 emission in alumina production and electrolytic aluminum process.With the consistent alumina production process,hydropower replacing thermal power can reduce the CO2 emissions of aluminum production by about 34%~43%.Moreover,according to the analysis of carbon reduction path,the CO2 emission reduction effect under the EGP-CP path was the best,and CO2 emissions per ton of aluminum can be reduced to 7.75×103 kg,which is 15.68% less than the BAU.

aluminumcarbon dioxidelife cycle thinkingcarbon accountingcarbon reduction path

吴凡、高成康、陈明明、朱素龙、张新虹、孟祥禹

展开 >

东北大学冶金学院,沈阳110819

东北大学国家环境保护生态工业重点实验室,沈阳110819

东北大学计算机科学与工程学院,沈阳110819

二氧化碳 生命周期思想 碳核算 减碳路径

国家自然科学基金

41871212

2024

材料与冶金学报
东北大学

材料与冶金学报

北大核心
影响因子:0.516
ISSN:1671-6620
年,卷(期):2024.23(1)
  • 31