首页|尊严与偏见:《民法典》视域下身体权保护的财产规则

尊严与偏见:《民法典》视域下身体权保护的财产规则

扫码查看
根据财产权与非财产权区分理论,人格权属于非财产权,而身体权作为物质性人格权,属于典型的非财产权。身体权的侵权保护,除医疗费和收入损失赔偿外,只能通过精神损害赔偿进行救济。随着生物科学技术的发展,身体及其组成部分的商业化利用越发普遍,固守人格权的非财产性不仅有违权利人实现《民法典》人格权编所赋身体权的主动权能,亦不利于为个体身体及组织被实质利用或侵害的情形下提供指引及救济。厘正传统人格权理论隔绝财产价值的理论偏见,正视身体权中的财产属性,利用财产规则加强对身体权的保护,同时通过责任规则与不可转让性对身体的财产权益施加必要的限制和禁止,能为人格权提供更具全面性、实质性的保护。
Dignity and Prejudice:Property Rules for the Right to Body from the Perspective of the Civil Code
According to the theory of distinguishing between property rights and non-property rights,personality rights belong to non-property rights,and body rights,as material personality rights,belong to typical non-property rights.Protection for violations of the right to the body can only be remedied through compensation for moral damages,with the exception of compensation for medical expenses and loss of income.With the development of biological science and technology,the commercial utilization of the body and its components has become a lot more common.Adhering to the non-property nature of personality right not only makes the individual unable to fully exercise the right of body,but also is not conducive to providing guidance and relief when the body and organization are actually used or infringed.Correct the traditional theory of personality rights to isolate the theoretical bias of property,recognize that body right as a kind of property right,use property rules to strengthen the protection of the body right,and at the same time impose necessary restrictions and prohibitions on the property rights and interests of the body through the rules of responsibility and non-transferability,so as to provide more comprehensive and substantive protection for personality rights.

Civil Codebody righttheoretical biasproperty ruleshuman dignity

孟婕、申长慧

展开 >

广东警官学院法学院,广东 广州 510440

中山大学马克思主义学院,广东 广州 510275

《民法典》 身体权 理论偏见 财产规则 人格尊严

2024

重庆社会科学
重庆市社会科学界联合会

重庆社会科学

CHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.627
ISSN:1673-0186
年,卷(期):2024.(12)