As a product of the cross-border integration of digital technology and procuratorial supervision,"non-custodial code"not only helps to realize the digital-enabled"cloud"supervision,but also conforms to the modernization require-ments of China's innovative development of digital procuratorial work,and vigorously promotes the construction of a new digital path for legal supervision.However,in the application process of"non-custodial code",there are operational di-lemmas as well as potential risk issues,such as research and development authorities power boundaries are not clear,the lack of legal provisions for the protection of personal information of suspects and defendants,"digital forgery","digital takeover"."digital takeover",diversified and systematic joint mechanisms for supervision have not yet been established,etc.As a new type of supervision means,"non-custodial code"should focus on reducing its own risk potential,help maintain the organic balance between human rights protection and litigation rights,and aim at realizing a new leap in dig-ital-enabled legal supervision.Specifically,this includes clarifying the functional orientation of the"non-custodial code"and the power boundaries of the research and development authority;strengthening the protection of digital human rights;breaking the mindset and being oriented towards the position of the"non-custodial code"user;clarifying the main posi-tion of the judiciary and adhering to the original intention of"technology serving the rule of law".By optimizing the col-laborative supervision method,we will clarify the division of responsibilities among various organs and the responsibilities of the construction and application of digital platforms,build a diversified joint mechanism,strengthen the supervision of suspect and defendants and other targeted measures,further structure and improve the regulatory system to deal with the new era,and help realize the beautiful vision of"accelerating the construction of a network power and a digital power".
non-custodial codedigital prosecutionsmart prosecutiondigital human rightsdigital forgery