传染病信息2024,Vol.37Issue(4) :373-377.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-8134.2024.04.016

"PBL+CBL"教学模式在传染病教学中的有效性研究——基于随机对照实验的Meta分析

Effectiveness of PBL+CBL teaching mode in infectious diseases education——A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

徐哲 刘凯 孙娇 黄锐 吴亚鑫
传染病信息2024,Vol.37Issue(4) :373-377.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-8134.2024.04.016

"PBL+CBL"教学模式在传染病教学中的有效性研究——基于随机对照实验的Meta分析

Effectiveness of PBL+CBL teaching mode in infectious diseases education——A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

徐哲 1刘凯 1孙娇 1黄锐 2吴亚鑫1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 100039 北京,解放军总医院第五医学中心感染病医学部生物损伤救治科
  • 2. 510515 广州,南方医科大学南方医院
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 评价相较于传统授课模式(lecture-based learning,LBL),以问题为基础的学习(problem-based learning,PBL)+以案例为基础的学习(case-based learning,CBL)在传染病教学中的效果.方法 系统检索了比较PBL+CBL教学与LBL教学效果的随机对照研究,比较了2种教学模式下学生的理论成绩,病例分析成绩,技能操作成绩,以及对课程的满意度等.采用RevMan 5.3软件进行数据分析.结果 纳入12篇随机对照试验文献,共包括研究对象1467例.Meta分析结果显示:PBL+CBL组的学生理论成绩高于对照组[均方差(mean difference,MD)=5.00,95%CI:3.65~6.35,P=0.000],技能操作成绩高于对照组(MD=3.67,95%CI:2.63~4.72,P=0.000),病例分析成绩高于对照组(MD=2.73,95%CI:1.74~3.72,P=0.000),并且PBL+CBL组学生对教学效果表示满意的高于LBL组(RR=1.28,95%CI:1.21~1.36,P=0.000).结论 在传染病教学中,PBL+CBL教学效果优于LBL教学,且学生对PBL+CBL的教学模式更加满意.

Abstract

Objective The effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) combined with case-based learning (CBL) in infectious disease teaching was evaluated,comparing to traditional lecture based learning (LBL). Methods Randomized controlled studies were systematically searched to explore the effectiveness of PBL+CBL and LBL in infectious disease teaching. Students'theoretical scores,case analysis scores,skill operation scores,and satisfaction with the course were calculated under the 2 teaching modes. RevMan 5.3 software was use for data analysis. Results Twelve randomized controlled trials were included,involving 1467 students. Meta-analysis results showed that the PBL+CBL group had significantly higher scores of theory examination[mean difference (MD)=5.00,95%CI=3.65-6.35,P=0.000],skill examination (MD=3.67,95%CI:2.63-4.72,P=0.000),and case analysis (MD=2.73,95%CI:1.74-3.72,P=0.000) than the LBL group. In addition,students are more satisfied with the PBL+CBL than the LBL[RR=1.28,95%CI:1.21-1.36,P=0.000]. Conclusion PBL+CBL teaching model is more effective than LBL teaching model in infectious disease teaching,and students are more satisfied with the PBL+CBL teaching model.

关键词

以问题为基础的学习/以案例为基础的学习/传染病学/Meta分析

Key words

problem-based learning/case-based learning/infectious diseases/meta-analysis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
传染病信息
解放军第三0二医院

传染病信息

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.366
ISSN:1007-8134
段落导航相关论文