首页|肋骨环抱器治疗肋骨骨折的有效性研究及有限元建模分析

肋骨环抱器治疗肋骨骨折的有效性研究及有限元建模分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨肋骨环抱器治疗肋骨骨折的疗效,采用有限元分析评估肋骨环抱器内固定治疗肋骨骨折的应力分布.方法 回顾性研究分析2019年1月-2022年12月北京市大兴区人民医院胸外血管外科收治的137例多发肋骨骨折患者资料,男性106例,女性31例;年龄25~62岁,平均37.0岁;道路交通伤64例,高处坠落伤34例,摔伤12例,钝器击打伤16例,其他11例.根据治疗方式,应用传统外固定非手术治疗的为传统组(62例),应用肋骨环抱器治疗的为环抱器组(75例).比较两组患者机械通气时间、引流管拔管时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、治疗前后VAS、止痛药物使用剂量、骨折愈合情况和围术期并发症发生情况.应用Mimics软件对人体胸廓CT数据进行三维重建,建立正常肋骨和肋骨环抱器内固定后的骨折肋骨模型,应用Abaqus17.0软件进行有限元分析,模拟并计算三种不同载荷下肋骨最大位移和应力响应情况.结果 与传统组比较,环抱器组机械通气时间[(6.1±1.3)dvs.(10.1±2.7)d]、引流管拔管时间[(1.75±0.32)d vs.(3.73±0.67)d]、下床活动时间[(7.84±2.40)h vs.(12.58±3.03)h]、住院时间[(6.70±1.43)d vs.(10.05±3.66)d]、骨折愈合时间[(22.92±8.40)d vs.(35.73±9.95)d]均显著缩短,治疗后 VAS[(3.3±0.9)分 vs.(5.2±1.2)分]显著降低,止痛药物使用剂量[(63.1±19.5)mg vs.(103.3±32.4)mg]显著减少,P均<0.001.评价骨折愈合效果,环抱器组优良率(97.3%,73/75)显著高于传统组(77.4%,48/62).环抱器组肺部感染、肺不张和胸廓畸形并发生率均明显低于传统组(P<0.05).有限元分析结果显示,肋骨骨折应用肋骨环抱器固定后其可承受较大的压力,骨折的最大移位比正常肋骨小,断面间隙值<0.01 mm.结论 肋骨环抱器内固定治疗肋骨骨折疗效显著.有限元分析也从生物力学角度证实肋骨环抱器具有良好的固定性能,能保证固定后肋骨的稳定性.
Rib embracing fixators in the treatment of rib fractures and finite element modeling and analysis
Objective To explore the efficacy of rib embracing fixators in the treatment of rib fractures,and to evaluate the stress distribution by finite element(FE)analysis.Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 137 patients with multiple rib fractures,including 106 males and 31 females aged 25-62 years with an average age of 37.0 years.There were 64 cases of road traffic injuries,34 falls from height,12 ground-level falls,16 blunt force injuries,and 11 others.According to the treatment methods,patients were divided into control group(traditional ex-ternal fixation and conservative treatment,n=62)and observation group(rib embracing fixators,n=75).The time of mechanical ventilation,drainage tube removal,off-bed activities,hospital stay and fracture healing,VAS before and after treatment,dosage of analgesics,bone union and perioperative complications were recorded and compared be-tween two groups.Iterative reconstruction of the human thorax CT data was performed by using the Mimics software.Normal rib and fractured rib FE models after internal fixation by using the rib embracing device were established.FE analysis was performed by using the Abaqus 17.0 software,and the maximum displacement and stress response of the rib under three different loads were simulated and calculated.Results Compared with the control group,the observation group showed much shorter mechanical ventilation(d,6.1±1.3 vs.10.1±2.7),much quicker drainage tube removal(d,l.75±0.32 vs.3.73±0.67),off-bed activities(h,7.84±2.40 vs.12.58±3.03),hospital dis-charge(d,6.70±1.43 vs.10.05±3.66),and fracture healing(d,22.92±8.40 vs.35.73±9.95),much smaller postoperative VAS(3.3±0.9 vs.5.2±1.2)and less analgesic use(mg,63.1±19.5 vs.103.3±32.4,all P<0.001).The excellent and good rate for bone union in the observation group was 97.3%,significantly higher than that in the control group(77.4%);while the incidence of pulmonary infection,atelectasis,and thoracic deformity in the observation group was significantly lower(P<0.05).FE analysis showed that the rib fractures can withstand greater pressure after being fixed with a rib embracing fixator,the maximum displacement of the fracture was smaller than that of the normal rib,and the sectional clearance was<0.01 mm.Conclusion The internal fixation of rib fractures by a rib embracing fixator can achieve good clinical outcomes.FE analysis also confirms that the rib em-bracing fixator has a good fixation performance from the perspective of biomechanics.It can ensure the stability of the fixed ribs.

Rib fracturesRib embracing fixatorInternal fixationFinite element analysis

王永平、王辉、郑翔、闻作川、田浩、陈鹏、刘冠群

展开 >

北京市大兴区人民医院胸外血管外科,北京 102600

肋骨骨折 肋骨环抱器 内固定 有限元分析

2024

创伤外科杂志
第三军医大学,大坪医院,野战外科研究所

创伤外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.017
ISSN:1009-4237
年,卷(期):2024.26(4)
  • 11