首页|我国医院创伤救治能力现状的抽样调查

我国医院创伤救治能力现状的抽样调查

扫码查看
目的 通过调查我国34家医院创伤救治能力建设现状,了解自2018年以来创伤中心的建设成果和存在的问题.方法 2023年组数据采集区间2017年1月——2023年7月,采取现场考察、座谈和问卷调研等方法,调研34家医院创伤救治能力,其中三级医院22家,二级医院11家,一级医院1家;2013年组数据采集区间2010年1月—2012年12月,采用同样方法调研了30家医院,其中三级医院17家,二级医院11家,一级医院2家.对比各级医院创伤病房开设情况,创伤患者数量、创伤手术数量及创伤患者死亡情况.结果 2023年组和2013年组比较:(1)分别有16家(47.1%)和13家医院(43.3%)设立了集中收治创伤患者病房;(2)创伤患者占住院患者比例分别为三级医院7.32%vs.7.92%、二级医院10.55%vs.9.14%、一级医院8.06%vs.11.33%;(3)创伤手术占比分别为三级医院17.01%vs.11.00%、二级医院13.28%vs.10.16%、一级医院51.96.%vs.34.72%;(4)创伤患者死亡占比分别为三级医院10.74%vs.11.68%、二级医院11.00%vs.27.99%;(5)2023年组医院均能提供24 h的创伤救治服务,50%的医院设立了创伤复苏区或创伤救治单元,较2013年组有明显改善(P<0.05);(6)2023年组医院的CT、超声、手术室可24 h开放,50%的医院采用床旁FAST超声.各级医院均具备承担批量伤员的救治和紧急扩充10%床位的能力.结论 近年来我国二级医院创伤患者比例增加、死亡占比下降,不但将患者留在当地医院,且救治能力明显提高,但创伤中心建设仍然需要进一步规范和加强.
Investigation on the current situation of hospital trauma care ability in China
Objective To investigate the current situation of hospital trauma care ability in China,and to explore the progress and existing problems in the construction of trauma centers since 2018. Methods Based on the investigation time,hospitals were divided into 2023 group (survey time from Jan. 2017 to Jul. 2023) and 2013 group (survey time from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2012),all by on-site investigation,panel discussion and questionnaire survey. There were 34 hospitals included in the 2023 group,including 22 tertiary,11 secondary and 1 primary hospi-tals;there were 30 hospitals included in the 2013 group,including 17 tertiary,11 secondary and 2 primary hospitals.The trauma care ability was assessed by the set of trauma wards,number of admitted trauma patients,number of trau-ma surgeries and proportion of traumatic deaths. Results For the 2023 group and 2013 group,there were respec-tively (1) 16 hospitals (47. 1%) and 13 hospitals (43. 3%) with centralized trauma wards;(2) 7. 32% vs.7.92% trauma patient percent (trauma patients/all hospital inpatients) in tertiary hospitals,10.55% vs. 9.14% in secondary hospitals and 8.06% vs. 11.33% in primary hospitals,(3) 17.01% vs. 11.00% trauma surgery percent(trauma surgeries/total hospital surgeries) in tertiary hospitals,13. 28% vs. 10. 16% in secondary hospitals and 51.96% vs. 34. 72% in primary hospitals,and (4) 10. 7% vs. 11. 7% traumatic death (traumatic deaths/all deaths) in tertiary hospitals and 11.0% vs. 28.0% in secondary hospitals. All the 34 hospitals in the 2023 group provide 24-h trauma care services,and some had set trauma resuscitation areas or trauma treatment units,which sig-nificantly improved the rescue ability and efficiency compared with the 2013 group(P<0.05). CT,ultrasound and operating room were 24-h on service,and 50% of the hospitals had bedside FAST ultrasound. Hospitals of all levels were able to handle massive casualties and to emergently expand the beds by 10%. Conclusion In recent years,secondary hospitals have increased trauma care ability,which admits a higher proportion of trauma patients but a de-creased proportion of traumatic deaths. However,the construction of trauma centers still needs to be further stand-ardized.

Trauma rescueTrauma care systemRescue ability

解雨、李阳、孙士锦、王韬、郭庆山、蒋建新、张连阳

展开 >

陆军军医大学大坪医院,创伤与化学中毒全国重点实验室,重庆 400042

创伤救治 创伤体系 救治能力

中国工程院院地合作项目

2023-CQ-XZ-02

2024

创伤外科杂志
第三军医大学,大坪医院,野战外科研究所

创伤外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.017
ISSN:1009-4237
年,卷(期):2024.26(5)