首页|严重创伤失血性休克患者实施不同液体复苏方法的治疗效果及预后分析

严重创伤失血性休克患者实施不同液体复苏方法的治疗效果及预后分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨急诊外科严重创伤失血性休克患者实施不同液体复苏方法治疗的效果及对预后的影响.方法 选取2022年5月至2024年5月空军军医大学第一附属医院收治的64例严重创伤失血性休克患者为研究对象,男性38例,女性26例,年龄(39.4±4.7)岁,年龄范围为22~62岁.根据患者不同复苏方式分为充分组(充分急诊液体复苏方法治疗,n=31)和限制组(限制性急诊液体复苏方法治疗,n=33).比较两组患者复苏前后的临床指标[一氧化氮(NO)、剩余碱(BE)、血清乳酸(BLA)]、氧代谢指标[混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)、氧消耗(VO2)、氧输送(DO2)]、凝血功能[活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、凝血酶时间(TT)]及复苏期间预后情况.结果 复苏前,两组患者的NO、BE、BLA、SvO2、VO2、DO2、aPTT、PT、TT水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).复苏后,两组患者的NO、BE、BLA显著下降,限制组NO、BLA低于充分组,BE高于充分组;两组患者的SvO2、VO2、DO2、均明显提高,限制组提高程度更显著;两组患者的aPTT、PT、TT均明显缩短,限制组缩短程度更明显,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).限制组患者的并发症总发生率显著低于充分组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 严重创伤失血性休克患者实施限制性液体复苏方法治疗比充分液体复苏方法疗效更佳,可有效维持重要脏器血流灌注,显著调节氧代谢,改善凝血功能,对减少患者并发症发生效果更显著.
Effect and prognosis of patients with hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma in emergency surgery treated with different fluid resuscitation methods
Objective To analyze the effect of different fluid resuscitation methods on the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock in emergency surgery.Methods A analysis was performed on 64 patients with severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock who received in the Emergency department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from May 2022 to May 2024,including 38 males and 26 females,aged(39.4±4.7)years old,aged 22 to 62 years old.According to different resuscitation methods,patients were divided into adequate group(adequate emergency fluid resuscitation method,n=31)and restricted group(limited emergency fluid resuscitation method,n=33).The indexes before and after resuscitation were compared between the two groups Clinical indexes including nitric oxide(NO),residual base(BE),serum lactic acid(BLA),oxygen metabolism indexes including mixed venous oxygen saturation(SvO2),oxygen consumption(VO2),oxygen delivery(DO2),coagulation function including activated partial thromboplastin time(aPTT),prothrombin time(PT),and coagulation of the two groups were compared before and after resuscitation Enzyme time(TT)and prognosis during resuscitation.Results Before resuscitation,there was no significant difference in the levels of NO,BE,BLA,SvO2,VO2,DO2,aPTT,PT and TT between 2 groups(P>0.05).After resuscitation,the levels of NO,BE and BLA in both groups decreased significantly,and the levels of NO and BLA in the restricted group were lower than those in the adequate group,and the levels of BE were higher than those in the adequate group.SvO2,VO2,DO2 were significantly increased in both groups,and the improvement was more significant in the restricted group.aPTT,PT and TT were significantly shortened in both groups,and the extent of shortening was more obvious in the restricted group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).The total incidence of complications in restricted group was significantly lower than that in sufficient group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion In patients with severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock,limited fluid resuscitation is more effective than full fluid resuscitation,which can effectively maintain blood perfusion of important organs,significantly regulate oxygen metabolism,improve coagulation function,and significantly reduce complications in patients.

Fluid resuscitationEmergency treatmentHemorrhagic shockOxygen metabolismIntensive careCoagulation functionPrognosis

薛海霞、张莉、曹彩霞

展开 >

空军军医大学第一附属医院急诊科,陕西西安 710032

液体复苏 急诊 失血性休克 氧代谢 重症监护 凝血功能 预后

2025

创伤与急危重病医学

创伤与急危重病医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2025.13(1)