首页|刑罚附随性制裁的逻辑架构与规范路径

刑罚附随性制裁的逻辑架构与规范路径

扫码查看
除了传统的刑罚制裁外,刑事定罪还会引发大量诸如获取职业资格、担任公职、入党入伍、落户积分等方面的限制或禁止,进一步加重受刑人的负担,可称之为"刑罚附随性制裁".近年来,我国频繁利用法律法规中的刑罚附随性制裁规定排斥受刑人,使其正当性和规范性问题成为焦点.究其原因,刑罚附随性制裁将功利主义作为其运行逻辑.对此,有必要将刑罚附随性制裁界定为"准刑罚"的性质,使刑罚附随性制裁从原有的功利主义制裁观向报应主义制裁观转化.为此,我国亟需优化刑罚附随性制裁的路径,要引导这类制裁从隐蔽走向透明,明确具体的适用条件,保障和恢复受刑人的权利,最大化地引导其朝着合理与适度的方向运行.
The logical framework and normative path of collateral sanctions in criminal punishment
In addition to traditional penal sanctions,criminalization also triggers a large number of restrictions or prohibitions,such as obtaining professional qualifications,holding public office,joining the party or military,and household registration points,which further aggravate the burden on the convicted.These can be termed"collateral sanctions".In recent years,China has frequently utilized the provisions of laws and regulations on collateral sanctions of punishment to exclude convicted persons,bringing the issue of their legitimacy and normativity to the forefront.The underlying reason for is that collateral sanctions take utilitarianism as their operating logic.In this regard,it is necessary to define collateral sanctions attached to the penalty as quasi-penal in nature,so that the collateral sanctions of punishment can be transformed from the original utilitarian view of the sanction to the retributive view of the sanction.To this end,China urgently needs to optimize the path of collateral sanctions of punishment guiding them from obscurity to transparency,clarifying specific application conditions,safeguarding and restoring the rights of the convicted,and maximizing their operation towards rationality and moderation.

collateral sanctionsutilitarianismretributivism

罗钢、来志俊

展开 >

新疆大学 法学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046

青海省祁连县人民法院 综合审判庭,青海 海北 810499

刑罚附随性制裁 功利主义 报应主义

2024

江苏理工学院学报
江苏技术师范学院

江苏理工学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.369
ISSN:2095-7394
年,卷(期):2024.30(5)