首页|认罪认罚从宽制度下的辩护冲突

认罪认罚从宽制度下的辩护冲突

扫码查看
认罪认罚从宽制度下"检察主导模式"、"控审合作模式"、辩护律师职业伦理与被追诉人自身利益考量之间的矛盾,以及辩护律师与值班律师差别性法律帮助权是引发辩护冲突的主要原因.认罪认罚案件中辩护律师处理辩护冲突应当以辩护律师的忠诚义务为出发点,坚持有限的独立辩护原则,强化辩护律师的协商义务,并在特定情形下履行对法庭的真实义务.审查起诉阶段认罪认罚案件的辩护冲突要区分"认罪"协商与"认罚"协商之辩护冲突分别处理,并确立审查起诉阶段控辩争议问题待处理的程序机制.审判阶段认罪认罚案件的辩护冲突要区分"定性"与"定量"存在争议的案件分别处理,并构建审判阶段辩方否定认罪认罚的程序规则.
Defense Conflicts Under the Leniency System of Guilty Plea and Punishment
Under the leniency system of guilty plea and punishment,the main reasons resulting in defense conflicts are"the prosecutorial-led model","the prosecutorial-trial cooperation model",and the professional ethics of defense lawyers with the consideration of the defendant's own interests,and the differentiated right of legal assistance between defense lawyers and duty lawyers.In the case of guilty plea and punishment,defense lawyers should deal with defense conflicts based on their loyalty obligations,adhere to the principle of limited independent defense,strengthen their negotiation obligations,and perform their real obligations to the court under specific circumstances.The defense conflicts in the case of guilty plea and punishment in the review and prosecution stage should be handled separately by distinguishing between the defense conflicts of"guilty plea"negotiation and"punishment"negotiation,and the procedural mechanism of pending prosecution and defense disputes in the review and prosecution stage should be established.The defense conflicts in the case of guilty plea and punishment at the trial stage should be handled separately by distinguishing between"qualitative"and"quantitative"controversial cases,and the procedural rules for the defense to deny guilty plea and punishment at the trial stage should be constructed.

guilty plea and punishmentconsensual prosecution and defensedefense conflictnegotiation obligation

郭恒

展开 >

太原理工大学 文法学院,山西 太原 030024

认罪认罚 控辩合意 辩护冲突 协商义务

2024

东北大学学报(社会科学版)
东北大学

东北大学学报(社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.69
ISSN:1008-3758
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 13