结直肠肛门外科2024,Vol.30Issue(1) :93-94.DOI:10.19668/j.cnki.issn1674-0491.2024.01.017

[评论]短程放疗+化疗+手术方案与长程放化疗+手术方案在治疗期间及治疗后的局部区域治疗失败情况比较:RAPIDO研究的5年随访结果分析

Locoregional failure during and after short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and surgery compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy and surgery:a 5-year follow-up of the RAPI-DO trial

DIJKSTRA E A NILSSON P J HOSPERS G A P 刘小军
结直肠肛门外科2024,Vol.30Issue(1) :93-94.DOI:10.19668/j.cnki.issn1674-0491.2024.01.017

[评论]短程放疗+化疗+手术方案与长程放化疗+手术方案在治疗期间及治疗后的局部区域治疗失败情况比较:RAPIDO研究的5年随访结果分析

Locoregional failure during and after short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and surgery compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy and surgery:a 5-year follow-up of the RAPI-DO trial

DIJKSTRA E A NILSSON P J HOSPERS G A P 刘小军1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 甘肃省人民医院放疗科二病区 甘肃兰州 730000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析RAPIDO研究的5年随访结果所呈现的局部区域治疗失败(locoregional failure,LRF)的类型及其危险因素.背景 多学科综合治疗模式改善了直肠癌患者的肿瘤局部控制效果.应用全程新辅助治疗(total neoadjuvant treatment,TNT)的目的是在保持良好的肿瘤局部控制效果的基础上改善肿瘤全身控制效果.既往研究基于RAPIDO研究的3年随访结果进行分析后发现,TNT方案与放化疗方案的LRF率相近.方法 共计920例患者被随机分为短程放疗组(术前短程放疗+化疗+手术方案)和标准放疗组(术前放化疗+手术+术后选择性辅助化疗).分析LRF的相关情况,包括早期的LRF(进行保留器官的切除/R2切除)和R0/R1切除后的局部区域复发(locoregional recurrence,LRR).结果 共计460例短程放疗组患者和446例标准放疗组患者的数据可以用于分析.当中位随访时间为5.6年时,短程放疗组和标准放疗组的LRF率分别为12%(54/460)和8%(36/446),两组间进行比较的P值为0.07;在LRF患者中,短程放疗组接受三维适形放疗的患者比例更高(P=0.029).在接受R0/R1切除的患者中,短程放疗组的LRR率高于标准放疗组[10%(44/431)vs.6%(26/426),P=0.027],在LRR患者中,短程放疗组的手术标本直肠系膜不完整的比例也更高[20%(9/44)vs.4%(1/26),P=0.048].在短程放疗组中,侧方淋巴结肿大、手术标本环周切缘阳性、存在癌结节和病理学淋巴结阳性是LRR的重要预测因素.两组LRR的位置分布较为一致.两组LRF之后的总生存情况相近(HR=0.76,95%CI为0.46~1.26,P=0.29).结论 5年的随访结果表明,短程放疗+化疗的术前治疗方案与LRR率的升高存在关联,但是在减少与疾病相关的治疗失败和减少远处转移方面仍然存在一定的优势.改进直肠癌TNT方案仍然是有必要的.

Abstract

Objective To analyze risk and patterns of locoregional failure(LRF)in patients of the RAPIDO trial at 5 years.Background Multimodality treatment improves local control in rectal cancer.Total neoadjuvant treatment(TNT)aims to improve systemic control while local control is maintained.At 3 years,LRF rate was comparable between TNT and chemoradiotherapy in the RAPIDO trial.Methods A total of 920 patients were randomized between an experimental(EXP,short-course radiotherapy,chemotherapy,and surgery)and a standard-care group(STD,chemoradiotherapy,surgery,and optional postoperative chemotherapy).LRFs,including early LRF(no resection except for organ preservation/R2 resection)and locoregional recurrence(LRR)after an R0/R1 resection,were analyzed.Results Totally,460 EXP and 446 STD patients were eligible.At 5.6 years(median follow-up),LRF was detected in 54/460(12%)and 36/446(8%)patients in the EXP and STD groups,respectively(P=0.07),in which EXP patients were more often treated with 3-dimensional-conformed radiotherapy(P=0.029).In the EXP group,LRR was detected more often[44/431(10%)vs.26/428(6%);P=0.027],with more often a breached mesorectum(9/44(21%)vs.1/26(4);P=0.048).The EXP treatment,enlarged lateral lymph nodes,positive circumferential resection margin,tumor deposits,and node positivity at pathology were the significant predictors for developing LRR.Location of the LRRs was similar between groups.Overall survival af-ter LRF was comparable[hazard ratio:0.76(95%CI,0.46-1.26);P=0.29].Conclusions The EXP treatment was associated with an increased risk of LRR,whereas the reduction in disease-related treatment failure and distant metastases remained after 5 years.Further refinement of the TNT in rectal cancer is mandated.

关键词

局部进展期直肠癌/局部区域治疗失败/局部区域复发/全程新辅助治疗

Key words

locally advanced rectal cancer/locoregional failure/locoregional recurrence/total neoadjuvant treatment

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
结直肠肛门外科
广西医科大学

结直肠肛门外科

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.957
ISSN:1674-0491
参考文献量2
段落导航相关论文