首页|土壤中汞的不同消解方式的比对分析

土壤中汞的不同消解方式的比对分析

扫码查看
测定土壤中汞元素质量分数时,常用前处理方式有水浴消解和微波消解.首先,对 2种消解方式进行了比较;然后,以土壤成分分析标准物质GSS-2为研究对象,对校准曲线建立、空白测定、精密度及准确度计算结果进行了分析;最后,选用Grubbs检验法对结果是否有异常值进行了判断,并使用SPSS的独立样本T检验对 2 组数据进行了差异性分析.结果表明:水浴消解和微波消解在测定土壤中汞元素质量分数时,无显著性差异.
Comparative Analysis of Different Digestion Methods of Mercury in Soil
Water bath digestion and microwave digestion are commonly digestion method for measuring the mass fraction of mercury element in soil.Firstly,a comparison was made between the two digestion methods;then,the standard substance GSS-2 for soil composition analysis was taken as the research object,and the calibration curve establishment,blank determination,precision and accuracy calculation results were analyzed;finally,the Grubbs test method was used to determine whether there were outliers in the results,and the independent sample T-test of SPSS was used to analyze the differences between the two groups of data.The results showed that there was no significant difference between water bath digestion and microwave digestion in determining the mass fraction of mercury in soil.

MercuryWater bath digestionMicrowave digestionT test

吴旸、谢璇、王婷、赵娇娇、李亭亭、尹西翔

展开 >

山东省济南生态环境监测中心,山东 济南 250014

水浴消解 微波消解 T检验

2024

当代化工
中国石油抚顺石化公司,中国石化抚顺石油化工研究院,沈阳市医药和化工行业联合会

当代化工

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.412
ISSN:1671-0460
年,卷(期):2024.53(12)