首页|"i人"还是"e人":青年MBTI社交符号互动、冲突与引导

"i人"还是"e人":青年MBTI社交符号互动、冲突与引导

扫码查看
当前"i人"和"e人"社交符号已然成为当代青年社交文化新样态,映射出青年在液态社会下对孤独的纾解,体现了青年反身性的自我观察,是青年再嵌入社会的积极尝试.研究通过扎根理论分析,尝试勾勒当代青年"i人"和"e人"的社交文化图景.当代青年在"主我"与"客我"的交互中形成自我的符号建构,通过"自我呈现"和"群体共鸣"促进符号互动,并在"归因"和"调整"的交互过程中实现符号调适以达到个体的平衡.然而这一过程也容易造成符号情感区隔、符号人设崩塌甚至符号自我裹挟等冲突.因此,完善自身知识框架、打破圈层壁垒、主动融入社会、形成理性社交价值共识是促进青年健康社交的应有之义.
Person I or Person E:The Interaction,Conflict,and Guidance of Social Symbols of MBTI Among Contemporary Youth
In recent years,the social symbols Person I and Person E have been constantly emerging on social platforms.This is a vivid manifestation of young people's social interaction and has become a new form of contemporary youth social culture.Its emergence reflects the loneliness relief of young people in a liquid society and embodies the self-observation of young people's reflexivity.It is a positive attempt for young people to reenter society.Through grounded theory analysis,this study attempts to outline the social cultural landscape of contemporary youth's Person I and Person E.Contemporary youth form self-symbolic construction through the interaction between I and Me promote symbolic interaction through"self-presentation"and"group resonance",and achieve symbolic adaptation in the process of socialization through"attribution"and"adjustment"to achieve individual balance.However,in this process,it is also easy to cause conflicts such as emotional separation of symbols,collapse of symbolic personification,and even self-imposed symbols.Therefore,it is necessary to enrich one's own knowledge framework,break through social barriers,actively integrate into society,form a rational consensus on social values,and enhance vision and pattern.

Person I and Person ESocial SymbolsInteractionConflict

宋一婷、秦一鸣

展开 >

上海理工大学材料与化学学院

上海开放大学

上海市终身教育学分银行

"i人" "e人" 社交符号 互动 冲突

2024

当代青年研究
上海社会科学院青少年研究所

当代青年研究

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.633
ISSN:1006-1789
年,卷(期):2024.(6)