首页|天津典型观测井渗透性变化及对玛多7.4级地震响应机理分析

天津典型观测井渗透性变化及对玛多7.4级地震响应机理分析

扫码查看
采用微水试验和固体潮汐反演两种方法计算了王3井、宝坻新井、宁河井不同时期渗透系数,经对比分析发现,两种方法计算含水层渗透系数所得结果在总体量级上是相当的,并且变化趋势是一致的,发育稳定、连续性较好的含水层中的观测井,二者计算结果更加接近.微水试验估算的井含水层渗透系数主要反映了井孔周围局部含水层渗透能力在短时间内水流过程中的渗透性特征,而固体潮汐反演估算的渗透系数则反映了在较长时间内较大范围含水层的平均渗透能力.因而,在观测井同震响应分析、抽(注)水干扰等异常核实分析中,使用微水试验估算的井含水层渗透系数更为合理,而在分析区域应力场变化中使用固体潮汐反演估算的渗透系数则更合理.本文分析了三口观测井水位和渗透性变化特征以及产生原因,并进一步分析了王3井和宝坻新井水位对2021年5月22日青海玛多7.4级地震同震响应机理,以及玛多地震对宁河井水位观测的影响机制,发现应力积累、抽/注水干扰、地震波传播等因素均会对含水介质渗透性造成影响.并且,地震波传播过程对不同含水介质造成的影响不同,而含水层岩性相同的不同观测井对同一地震的响应特征和机理也不相同.
Permeability Changes of Tianjin Typical Observation Wells and Coseismic Response Mechanism to Maduo Ms7.4 Earthquake
This article uses two methods,slug test and tide inversion,to calculate the per-meability coefficient of Wang 3 Well,Baodi New Well,and Ninghe Well at different peri-ods.Comparing the calculation results,we find that the results obtained by using two methods are comparable in overall magnitude,and the trend of change is consistent.Espe-cially for observation wells in aquifers with stable development and good continuity,the calculation results of the two methods are closer.The permeability coefficient estimated by slug test mainly reflects the permeability characteristics of the local aquifer around the wellbore during the short-term water flow process.The permeability coefficient estimated by tide inversion reflects the average permeability of a large range of aquifers over a long period of time.Therefore,in the analysis of coseismic response and abnormal verification of water pumping(injection)interference,using slug tests to estimate the permeability co-efficient of the well aquifer is more reasonable,and it is more reasonable to use tide inver-sion to estimate the permeability coefficient in analyzing regional stress field changes.We analyze the characteristics and causes of water level and permeability change char-acteristics and causes of the three observation wells,as well as,we analyze mechanism of water level coseismic response in Wang 3 Well and Baodi New Well to the Maduo Ms7.4 earthquake in Qinghai Province on May 22,2021,and the impact mechanism of the Maduo earthquake to water level in Ninghe Well.We find that factors,such as stress accumula-tion,pumping or injection water,and seismic wave propagation,can affect the permeabili-ty of aquifer medium.Moreover,the propagation process of seismic waves has different impacts on different aquifer medium,and the response characteristics and mechanisms of observation wells with the same aquifer lithology to the same earthquake are also differ-ent.

Permeability coefficientSlug testTide inversionCoseismic responseThe 2021 Maduo Ms7.4 earthquake

李悦、马晗宇、刘振辉、王熠熙、邵永新

展开 >

天津市地震局,天津 300201

天津市地质环境监测总站,天津 300191

渗透系数 微水试验 固体潮汐反演 同震响应 2021年玛多7.4级地震

天津市地质环境监测项目天津市地震局科研项目

津地矿任[2024]1号2021210

2024

地震
中国地震局地震预测研究所 中国地震学会地震预报专业委员会 中国地震学会地震流体专业委员会 中国地震学会地震电磁学专业委员会

地震

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.733
ISSN:1000-3274
年,卷(期):2024.44(2)
  • 21