首页|基于多源卫星影像的同震地表破裂带迹象变化识别——以2001年昆仑山口西MS8.1地震为例

基于多源卫星影像的同震地表破裂带迹象变化识别——以2001年昆仑山口西MS8.1地震为例

扫码查看
基于震前、震后多期卫星数据,对2001年11月4日昆仑山口西MS8.1同震地表破裂进行了研究,结果表明:①同震破裂带的西段在震前未发现先存破裂遗迹,而东段是在先存地震破裂遗迹上再次发生了破裂.②震后两年,湖面冰、大型河道、冲沟和冲洪积扇上的地表破裂迅速地被活动性流水和气温变化等破坏,在影像上已无踪迹;震后二十年,低级阶地的地表破裂几乎无法识别,而高级阶地的破裂带保留较完整,可识别长度锐减至64%,呈"碎片"化展布.因此,同震地表破裂带的影像识别主要受所处地貌位置和气候变化等地表作用过程的影响,同时也受影像的空间分辨率及影像获取时间等因素的影响;而较老地貌面上保留的破裂带遗迹仍有助于开展历史地震、古地震地表破裂带的回溯研究.
Change identification of coseismic surface rupture zone over time based on multi-source satellite images:A case study of the west of Kunlunshan Pass MS8.1 earthquake in 2001
Coseismic surface rupture is the permanent deformation on the surface in the middle and upper parts of the earth's crust during a strong earthquake occurred.It indicates to a certain extent the deep structural characteristics of the active faults and the pre-existing tectonic envir-onment,so complete extraction of characteristic of coseismic surface rupture has an important influence on the understanding of geometry and structure of the active faults.On November 14,2001,a West Pass of Kunlunshan earthquake with magnitude of MS8.1 occurred at Hoh Xil of no man's land in Golmud City,Qinghai Province,northern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau.The instrumental epicenter was located near the Kunlun mountains at the junc-tion of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and Qinghai Province within higher local altitude.The strong quake destroyed the Qinghai-Xizang Railway under construction and Qinghai-Xiz-ang Highway connecting Xining to Lhasa,causing major economic losses to the country's life-line projects.Due to the hypoxia,harsh natural environment,and inconvenient transportation of the epicenter area which difficult to conduct extensive field surveys.It is necessary to use high-resolution satellite archived images to study the time-varying characteristics of coseismic surface rupture induced by recent strong earthquakes,which has important reference signific-ance for conducting research on historical strong earthquake events.This paper uses multi-tem-poral high-resolution satellite images(with resolution of 1-6 m)covering the coseismic surface rupture zone of the 2001 MS8.1 mainshock in the west of Kunlun Pass as the main research data to discuss the changes of coseismic surface rupture zone at different segments under natural sur-face process and check the reasons for its changes.We select USGS KeyHole images with a spatial resolution of 6 m as pre-earthquake im-ages,and the multi-period image data within 20 years post-earthquake from Google Earth(1 m),ALOS(10 m),Chinese GF-2(1 m),and GF-7(0.6 m).We use a comprehen-sive method of machine-assisted visual interpretation to extract the distribution of the coseismic rupture zone.The research results show that:① A nearly 400 km linear coseismic surface rup-ture zone was formed during the 2001 earthquake,no pre-existing rupture remains were found in the relatively shorter western section before the earthquake,while the fresh coseismic rupture was reoccurrence along pre-existing earthquake ruptures at the longer eastern section.② In 2003,two years after the earthquake,the coseismic surface ruptures locating at lake surface,crossing river valleys,gullies and alluvial fans which been checked during the earthquake field survey were rapidly affected by seasonal water flow and temperature(lake ice melt)changes.In 2011,10 years after the earthquake,the surface rupture segments gradually showed a signific-ant fragmented distribution on the images.Usually,continuous coseismic surface rupture zones can only be identified on high-level terraces or locations far away from active alluvial fans;in 2021,20 years after the earthquake,coseismic surface ruptures on low-level terraces are al-most impossible to identify,while the rupture zones on high-level terraces are relatively intact.The total length of identifiable rupture zones sharply reduced to 64%.More than 500 coseismic rupture sections had disappeared from the images during the past 20 years.③ The measure-ment of coseismic horizontal dislocation based on GF image 20 years after the earthquake shows that the distribution of horizontal dislocation still has multiple peaks with maximum measured horizontal coseismic slip of 8.6 m,which is consistent with previous field survey but slightly smaller,and this proved that high quality satellite images can be used to combine the discon-tinuous coseismic rupture zone to together the length.The identification of whole coseismic surface rupture zones on images is mainly affected by the surface processes.It is also affected by the spatial resolution of the images and their ac-quisition time.The identification of coseismic surface rupture of strong earthquakes can rely on emergency scientific surveys and satellite and aerial image data shortly after the earthquakes.However,the identification of surface rupture zones in uninhabited areas and historical strong earthquakes mainly relies on long-elapsed time and satellite imagery.Through residual rupture zone information on older landforms,it can recover more complete surface rupture zones than can be directly observed at the surface ground.Using satellite remote sensing images,scholars can restore the rupture scale of paleo-earthquakes and historical earthquakes,the surface rup-ture zone can be traced back through the residual rupture traces on older landforms,which is helpful in estimating the total length of the surface rupture zone,its magnitude,etc.Our re-search shows that the transformation process of coseismic surface ruptures induced by strong earthquakes can be understood in detail using multi-temporal high-spatial resolution images,which provides a methodological reference for exploring a large number of active faults within the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau to assess their earthquake risk in the future.

coseismic surface rupture zonewest of Kunlunshan Pass MS8.1 earthquakeKeyHoleGaofen satellite imagesurface process

李佳怡、徐岳仁、张军龙、母若愚

展开 >

中国北京 100036 中国地震局地震预测研究所(地震预测与风险评估应急管理部重点实验室)

中国北京 100036 中国地震局地震预测重点实验室

中国成都 610000 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院

同震地表破裂带 昆仑山口西MS8.1地震 锁眼 高分卫星影像 地表过程

2024

地震学报
中国地震学会 中国地震局地球物理研究所

地震学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.186
ISSN:0253-3782
年,卷(期):2024.46(6)