首页|泸定Ms4.5地震不对称高陡谷坡地震动响应

泸定Ms4.5地震不对称高陡谷坡地震动响应

扫码查看
基于2023年四川泸定Ms4.5地震实测地震动数据,开展不对称斜坡时频域数据分析.结果表明:1)位于右岸1#监测点的PGA放大系数最大,水平向和竖直向分别为3.16~15.08、4.37;2)Arias强度右岸最大值为2.24 cm/s,左岸最大值为0.79 cm/s,说明右岸地震动响应能量更强;3)斜坡右岸监测点的卓越频率为2~9 Hz,左岸卓越频率为2~17 Hz,地震幅值所呈现出来的能量在水平向比竖直向更为集中.地震动响应在不对称高陡谷坡右岸凸出半岛状斜坡地形比直线形斜坡更为强烈,高位覆盖层的存在会增强地震动响应.
Asymmetric High and Steep Valley Slope Ground Motion Response for the Luding Ms4.5 Earthquake
Based on the measured ground motion data of the Ms4.5 earthquake in Luding,Sichuan in 2023,we conduct an asymmetric slope time-frequency domain data analysis.The results show that:1)The PGA amplification factor at monitoring point 1# on the right bank is highest,with horizontal and vertical values of 3.16 to 15.08 and 4.37,respectively.2)The maximum Arias intensity on the right bank is 2.24 cm/s,and the maximum Arias intensity on the left bank is 0.79 cm/s,indicating that the seismic energy on the right bank is stronger.3)The dominant frequency distribution of the monitoring points on the right bank of the slope is 2 to 9 Hz,while the dominant frequency on the left bank is 2 to 17 Hz.The energy presented by the seismic amplitude is more concentrated in the hori-zontal than in the vertical direction.On the right bank of the asymmetric high steep valley slope,the protruding peninsula shaped slope terrain has a stronger response than the straight shaped slope.

Lauding Ms4.5 earthquaketerrain amplification effectHilbert-Huang transformationslope ground motionhigh and steep covering layer

宋华英、王运生、贺建先、杜勇江、唐涛、吴昊宸

展开 >

成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,成都市东三路1号,610059

泸定Ms4.5地震 地形放大效应 希尔伯特-黄变换 斜坡地震动 高陡覆盖层

2025

大地测量与地球动力学
中国地震局地震研究所 地壳运动监测工程研究中心等

大地测量与地球动力学

北大核心
影响因子:0.589
ISSN:1671-5942
年,卷(期):2025.45(1)