首页|基于三维生态足迹的长江经济带生态安全动态评价

基于三维生态足迹的长江经济带生态安全动态评价

扫码查看
长江经济带是新时代中国重大战略发展区域之一,其生态建设对长江流域的社会经济发展和生态屏障建设起着重要作用,开展生态安全动态评价十分重要。论文选取多源数据,采用改进的三维生态足迹模型,模拟2000-2020年长江经济带的足迹深度、足迹广度以及三维生态足迹,而后进一步构建生态压力指数、生态经济协调指数、流量资本占用率和存量资本流量利用比等指标量化生态安全变化,最后利用偏最小二乘回归分析法研究了三维生态足迹的驱动要素。结果表明:①在时间上,研究期间长江经济带足迹广度呈上升趋势但整体利用水平不高,足迹深度较大且表现出明显上升趋势(长江三角洲除外),通过消耗资本存量来满足自然资源需求;在空间上,地类足迹广度呈"西高东低"格局,足迹深度则相反;在地类组分构成上,足迹广度、足迹深度各地类占比不平衡,耕地对足迹广度、足迹深度的贡献率最大,林地生态可持续性较好。②长江经济带各地区生态安全状况差异较大。长江三角洲地区过度消耗存量资本,生态安全形势严峻。长江中游、成渝双城地区生态环境相对安全,但生态环境与经济发展可能存在逐渐失衡的趋势。云贵地区自然禀赋优越,生态安全状况较好。③驱动力分析表明,能源消耗、经济发展、城市扩张是导致区域生态资本占用增加的重要因素,而科技水平、生态建设在目前阶段对自然资源利用的影响程度较小。研究为长江经济带各地区生态环境保护与经济、城市建设协调发展提供了理论依据和实践指引,可为长江经济带整体发展规划提供参考,助力区域社会、经济与生态环境的协调发展。
Dynamic assessment of ecological security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on three-dimensional ecological footprint
The Yangtze River Economic Belt(YREB)is one of the key strategic development regions in China in the new era.Its ecological construction plays a pivotal role in the socioeconomic development and ecological barrier construction of the Yangtze River Basin,therefore it is very important to carry out dynamic ecological security assessment.This study used an improved three-dimensional footprint model to calculate the footprint depth,footprint size,and 3D ecological footprint of the YREB from 2000 to 2020,and constructed the ecological pressure index,ecological and economic coordination coefficient,occupancy rate of capital flows,and use ratio of stock-flows to quantify the ecological security changes.Finally,partial least squares regression was used to analyze the driving factors of the 3D ecological footprint,in order to understand the ecological security status of the YREB in the process of rapid urbanization,and to promote the coordinated development of the region.The results show that:1)Temporally,the footprint size of the YREB showed an increasing trend during the study period,but the overall utilization level was not high.The footprint depth was large and showed an obvious increasing trend(except for the Yangtze River Delta),which met the demand for natural resources by consuming capital stock.Spatially,the land use type footprint size was high in the west and low in the east,while the footprint depth was the opposite.In terms of land use type contribution,the proportion of land use types in the footprint size and footprint depth was unbalanced.The contribution rate of cultivated land to the footprint size and depth was the largest,and the ecological sustainability of woodland was better than other land use types.2)The natural and socioeconomic environments in different regions in the YREB are very different,and their ecological security situation also differs.The Yangtze River Delta area overconsumes the stock and the ecological pressure is huge.In the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and the Chengdu-Chongqing area,the ecological environment is relatively secure,but there is a trend of imbalance between the ecological environment and economic development.The upper reaches of the Yangtze River have excellent natural endowment and high ecological security.3)Driving factor analysis showed that energy consumption,economic development,and urban expansion play a positive role in driving the three-dimensional ecological footprint,while science and technology development level and ecological construction have little impact on the utilization of natural resources at present.It is necessary to increase the investment in science and technology development,optimize the industrial structure,and promote the positive interaction between ecological environment protection and economic development.

three-dimensional ecological footprintecological securitydynamic assessmentYangtze River Economic Beltdriving factor analysis

徐秋怡、颜凤芹、丁智、汤旭光、姚丽

展开 >

西南大学地理科学学院,重庆 400715

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101

杭州师范大学遥感与地球科学研究院,杭州 311121

浙江外国语学院文化和旅游学院,杭州 310023

展开 >

三维生态足迹 生态安全 动态评价 长江经济带 驱动分析

国家自然科学基金项目中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目

41901145SWU2209225

2024

地理科学进展
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 中国地理学会

地理科学进展

CSTPCDCSSCI北大核心
影响因子:2.458
ISSN:1007-6301
年,卷(期):2024.43(6)
  • 33