首页|反垄断视阈下的数据隐私保护

反垄断视阈下的数据隐私保护

扫码查看
随着信息时代的到来和数字平台的崛起,隐私保护与反垄断开始产生交集.对于如何处理二者的关系,存在着分离模式与统一模式两种争论.分离模式基于二者在法律目标与实施方式上的差异,主张数据隐私不应当纳入反垄断;统一模式则将数据隐私类比于产品质量或纳入产品质量的分析中,主张反垄断应当考虑数据隐私.由于数据隐私保护提升与市场竞争强化之间可能存在不一致,且反垄断将隐私保护纳入其中也存在分析方法上的困难,统一模式的适用应当慎重;相比之下,分离模式更具可执行性,也更符合数据隐私保护的实践需求,是更为可取的选择.在我国数据隐私保护相关法律制度不断完善的背景下,分离模式也是我国的应然选择.
Data Privacy Protection from the Perspective of Antitrust
With the advent of the information age and the rise of digital platforms,privacy protection and anti-trust have come to be related to each other.Regarding the relationship between them,there are two main ap-proaches:the separation approach and the integration approach.The separation approach holds that data privacy should not be included in antitrust,which is based on the differences between privacy protection and an-titrust in terms of legal goals and implementation methods.The integration approach believes that antitrust should take data privacy into consideration,which attempts to compare data privacy to product quality or in-cludes data privacy in product quality.Since there might be inconsistencies between the improvement of data privacy protection and the strengthening of market competition,and challenges in analyzing privacy protection in antitrust law,the separation approach seems to be the more appropriate approach.In the context of the con-tinuous improvement of data privacy protection in China,the separation approach could be a better choice.

Data privacyAntitrustIntegration approachSeparation approach

张巍

展开 >

北京大学法学院,北京 100871

对外经济贸易大学涉外法治研究院,北京 100029

数据隐私 反垄断 统一模式 分离模式

中国法学会民法学研究会青年学者研究项目

2020MFXH003

2024

大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)
大连理工大学

大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.8
ISSN:1008-407X
年,卷(期):2024.45(2)
  • 31