首页|专著:中美社科学术体系的比较与展望

专著:中美社科学术体系的比较与展望

扫码查看
改革学术评价体系,是推动学术高质量发展的重要路径之一,对此,国外先进经验有一定参考价值.在社会科学学术体系中,美国形成了以投入三四年的博士学位论文为基础、再加上六七年的后续研究的重量级专著传统.它固然存在广泛偏重主观理论过于客观经验研究,偏重建构理想化的、逻辑上前后一贯的理论模式的弱点,但奠定了其在国际社科学术领域的重要地位.中国的博士学位论文制度在实际运作中则表现出深层的矛盾,没有形成较为重量级专著传统,因此使中国自身的学术水平提升受到一定限制.目前的中国社科学术体系亟须改革,需要从国家层面鼓励结合中国实际的重量级经验研究与新型社科理论的专著,来塑造具有中国主体性的专著体系.
Monograph:Comparison and Prospect of Chinese and American Academic Systems of Social Sciences
The reform of academic evaluation system is an important path to promoting the development of high academic quality,which can refer to foreign advanced experiences.In the academic sys-tem of social sciences,the United States has developed a heavyweight monograph tradition based on three or four years of doctoral dissertations in addition to six or seven years of follow-up resear-ches.Although there are some problems such as focusing more on subjective theory than objective empirical research or laying particular stress on idealized and logically consistent theoretical mod-els,it has established its core position in the international academic field of social sciences.There exist deep contradictions in practical operation in China's doctoral dissertation system,it has not yet established a heavyweight monograph tradition comparable to that of the United States,as a re-sult,China's own scholarship is limited to a secondary level.The current China's academic sys-tem of social sciences is in urgent need of reform,it is necessary to encourage on the national level monographs of heavyweight empirical researches and new-type theories of social sciences in ac-cordance with China's reality to build a monograph system with Chinese subjectivity and cogni-tion.

黄宗智、赵珊

展开 >

美国加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶校区历史系

天津商业大学法学院

中美专著环境 美国的专著传统 中国的社科学术体系 新型社科理论创建

2024

东南学术
福建省社会科学界联合会

东南学术

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.648
ISSN:1008-1569
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 5