首页|托瑞米芬与他莫昔芬治疗进展期乳腺癌的系统评价

托瑞米芬与他莫昔芬治疗进展期乳腺癌的系统评价

扫码查看
目的:评价托瑞米芬(TOR)与他莫昔芬(TAM)治疗进展期乳腺癌的有效性和安全性.方法:计算机检索PubMed,CBMdisc,Cochrane Library,中国生物医学文献数据库,中国期刊全文数据库,中文科技期刊全文数据库等,并辅以手工检索和其他检索.按纳入标准全面搜集有关TOR对比TAM治疗进展期乳腺癌的随机对照试验,检索截至2008-06.按照Cochrane系统评价手册4.2.6质量评价标准,由2位研究者独立对纳入研究进行方法学质量评价,并进行资料提取,采用RevMan4.2.10软件进行Meta分析,计数资料采用相对危险度(RR)为疗效分析统计量;计量资料采用加权均数差(WMD).结果:纳入10个随机对照试验(3680例患者).Meta分析结果显示:TOR组与TAM组相比,1,3 a总生存率差异无统计学意义,5 a总生存率差异有统计学意义,其RR和95%可信区间(CI)分别为1.00(0.97,1.03),1.04(0.98,1.09),1.06(1.01,1.12);1,3 a无病生存率差异无统计学意义,5 a无病生存率差异有统计学意义,其RR(95%CI)分别为1.00(0.98,1.02),1.05(1.00,1.10),1.08(1.02,1.15);完全缓解率、部分缓解率及客观缓解率差异均无统计学意义,其RR(95%CI)分别为1.41(0.90,2.22),0.91(0.71,1.17),0.97(0.82,1.14).TOR组不良事件发生率低于TAM组,生存质量与TAM组相似.结论:TOR在提高进展期乳腺癌患者的远期生存率和安全性方面均优于TAM.
Toremifene and tamoxifen for patients with advanced breast cancer:A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
AIM:To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of toremifene ( TOR ) versus tamoxifen (TAM ) for patients with advanced breast cancer. METHODS: This study retrieved relevant randomized controlled trials in PubMed,EMB ASE,Cochrane Library,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database,and Chinese Journal Full-text Database up to June 2008. According to the handbook 4. 2. 6 of Cochrane collaborate,two reviewers assessed the quality of included trials and extracted data independently. The RevMan 4. 2. 10 software was used for Meta-analysis,relative risk( RR) was used as statistical index for numeration data and weighted mean difference (WMD) was used for measurement data. RESULTS: Ten studies were ineiuded(3680 patients). Meta-analysis showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups in 1 and 3-year overall survival rate,but statistical difference was observed in 5-year overall survival rate. The pooled RR and 95% CI were respectively 1. 00 (0.97,1.03),1.04(0.98,1.09) and 1.06(1.01,1.12). No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups in 1 and 3-year disease-free survival rate but statistical difference was observed in 5-year disease-free survival rate. The pooled RR and 95% CI were respectively 1.00(0.98,1.02),1.05(1.00,1.10),and 1.08( 1. 02,1. 15). No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups in complete response,partial response and objective response. The pooled RR and 95% CI were respectively 1. 41 (0.90,2.22),0.91(0.71,1. 17) and 0.97(0.82,1.14). Adverse reactions in TOR group were lower than those in TAM group,and the quality of life was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that TOR has better effectiveness and safety than TAM in improving the long-term survival rate for patients with advanced breast cancer.

breast neoplasmsendocrine therapyTamoxifenToremifenesystematic review

马文、王小虎、杨克虎、田金徽、刘锐锋

展开 >

甘肃省肿瘤医院,甘肃,兰州,730050

兰州大学循证医学中心,甘肃,兰州,730000

乳腺肿瘤 内分泌治疗 托瑞米芬 他莫昔芬 系统评价

2009

第四军医大学学报
第四军医大学

第四军医大学学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.599
ISSN:1000-2790
年,卷(期):2009.30(11)
  • 6
  • 5