首页|高频震荡通气与传统机械通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征临床研究的Meta分析

高频震荡通气与传统机械通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征临床研究的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的:探讨高频震荡通气(HFOV)与传统机械通气(CMV)治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效及其安全性.方法:通过数据库检索出符合纳入分析条件的相关文献12篇,采用Meta分析方法进行定性、定量综合分析,得出合并OR值及其95%的可信区间.结果:与CMV相比,HFOV能明显改善呼吸窘迫综合征患儿的呼吸功能(P<0.05)以及降低慢性肺部疾病的发生率(P<0.01),但增加了新生儿颅内出血的危险性(P<0.05);在HFOV和CMV两种通气方式导致的气漏发生方面,则无统计学差异.结论:经用Meta分析认为应用HFOV治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果优于CMV,并可减少慢性肺部疾病的发生,但应注意新生儿颅内出血的并发症发生.
Meta-analysis of high frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
AIM:To investigate the effect and safety of high frequency oscillatory ventilation(HFOV)and conventional mechanical ventilation(CMV)in neonates with the respiratory distress syndrome(RDS).METHODS:Meta analysis was used to evaluate the data extracted from 12 published papers.Combined Odds ratio(OR)and its 95% confidence interval were calculated.RESULTS:Compared to CMV,HFOV was found to improve pulmonary function(P<0.05)and reduce the incidence of chronic lung disease(CLD)(P<0.01).However,the use of HFOV resulted in an increase in intracranial hemorrhage(ICH)(P<0.05)in infants with RDS.There was no difierence in the incidence of air leak induced by HFOV and CMV.CONCLUSION:HFOV is more benefical than CMV in its therapeutic effect on neonatal RDS and in its ability to reduce the incidence of CLD.This benefit may be offset by the increase in the occurrence of ICH when using this modality.

high frequency oscillatory ventilationrespiratory distress syndromeconventional mechanical ventilationMeta-analyses

李强、孙正香、李贵南

展开 >

湖南省儿童医院新生儿科,湖南,长沙,410007

高频震荡通气 呼吸窘迫综合症 传统机械通气 Meta分析 新生儿

2009

第四军医大学学报
第四军医大学

第四军医大学学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.599
ISSN:1000-2790
年,卷(期):2009.30(21)
  • 10
  • 17