首页|MELD预测ETV治疗乙型肝炎ACLF患者的短期疗效

MELD预测ETV治疗乙型肝炎ACLF患者的短期疗效

扫码查看
目的:探讨终末期肝病模型(MELD)在乙型肝炎慢加急性肝功能衰竭患者预后评估意义及恩替卡韦抗病毒治疗短期疗效.方法:84例治疗组乙型病毒性肝炎慢加急性肝功能衰竭患者在常规内科治疗基础上加用恩替卡韦0.5 mg/d治疗,99例对照组患者采用常规内科治疗,计算患者入院时的MELD分值和接受治疗2 wk后的MELD分值与入院时MEL0D分值的差值(△MELD分值),分析MELD分值和AMELD分值与患者6 mo病死率的关系.观察不同MELD分值组中恩替卡韦抗病毒治疗对生存率的影响.结果:抗病毒治疗组患者入院时MELD分值和接受治疗2 wk后AMELD分值预测慢性重型肝炎患者6 mo内病死率的C-统计值分别为0.649和0.745.MELD≤25组,治疗组病死率为28.2%(11/39),低于对照组57.9%(22/38),差异有统计学意义(x~2=6.928,P=0.008).25<MELD≤30组,治疗组及对照组病死率分别为42.4%(14/33)、61.7%(29/47),差异无统计学意义(x~2=2.898,P=0.089),30<MELD≤35组,治疗组及对照组病死率分别为62.5%(5/8)、76.9%(10/13),差异无统计学意义(x~2=0.505,P=0.477),MELD>35时,治疗组4例患者2例死亡(2/4),对照组1例患者死亡(1/1),差异无统计学意义(x~2=0.833,P=0.600).结论:MELD可应用于预测乙型肝炎慢加急件肝功能衰竭患者的预后,但接受治疗2 wk后的AMELD预测能力优于MELD.恩替卡韦抗病毒治疗能提高患者的生存率,但应尽早采用.
Evaluation of the model for end-stage liver disease as prognostic predictor for the acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure and the efficacy of entecavir therapy
AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of enticavir treatment and the model for end-stage liver disease(MELD)as prognostic predictor for the acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure.METHODS:Eighty-four patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure were treated with entecavir 0.5 mg daily and the routine treatment. As a control group, another 99 patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure were treated with the routine treatment for comparison. The MELD scores on the day of their admittance to our hospital and the AMELD scores after 2 weeks of medical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The mortalities of different MELD score groups were also compared between the treatment group and the control group. Analysis was conducted using two-sample t test, the χ~2 test and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve where appropriate. RESULTS:The area under the ROC curve of MELD score(c-statistic)was 0. 649, while the C-statistic for AMELD score was 0.745. On the first day of their admission, when the MELD score was < 25, the mortality rates in treatment group and control group were 28.2%(11/39)and 57.9%(22/38), respectively(χ~2 =6.928, P=0.008). When it was 25≤ MELD score <30, the mortality rates in treatment group and control group were 42.4% (14/33)and 61.7%(29/47), respectively(χ~2 = 2. 898, P =O. 089). When it was 30 < MELD score < 35, the mortality rates in treatment group and control group were 62.5%(5/8)and 76.9%(10/13), respectively(χ~2 =0.505, P=0.477). If MELD score>35, the mortality rates in treatment group and control group were 50%(2/4)and 100%(1/1), respectively(χ~2 =O. 833, P = 0.600). CONCLUSION:The MELD was prognostic indicators in patients with acute on chronic hepatitis B liver failure with entecavir treatment. The AMELD was better than MELD to be the prognostic predictor. It suggests that entecavir may prevent fatality in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure if therapy starts early enough when the MELD score is less than 25.

hepatitis Bchronicliver failureacute on chronicentecavirantiviral therapymodel for end-stage liver disease

舒欣、徐启桓、陈旎、谢奇峰、李刚

展开 >

中山大学附属第三医院感染性疾病科,广东省广州,510630

肝炎 乙型 慢性 肝功能衰竭 慢加急性 恩替卡韦 抗病毒治疗 终末期肝病模型

广东省科技计划项目

20088030301052

2009

第四军医大学学报
第四军医大学

第四军医大学学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.599
ISSN:1000-2790
年,卷(期):2009.30(24)
  • 1