首页|《公司法》企业家精神条款的价值引领功能——以公司法律监管为重点

《公司法》企业家精神条款的价值引领功能——以公司法律监管为重点

扫码查看
企业家精神就是市场活力,是社会创新驱动力.企业家精神条款是落实我国市场体制方略的法律表达,亦是填补《公司法》内在体系的理性价值.新法适用中,应当充分激活企业家精神条款的价值引领功能,避免法律监管规范孤立适用所造成的新一轮利益失衡风险,防止企业家精神条款现实目的发生偏离.企业家精神条款所蕴含的个体主义价值表达要求新《公司法》充分发挥市场在资源配置中的决定性作用,强调以商人自治作为公司治理核心.应以企业家精神条款的个体主义价值为引领,对公司法律监管规范作出如下解释适用:其一,缓和董监高及双控人的法律强制监督,回归公司自决和市场引导;其二,对决议不成立情形遵循实质审查标准;其三,对禁止股东权利滥用原则建立更为具化的要件审查标准,从保护弱势股东转向保护被压迫股东.
The value-leading function of entrepreneurship clause in the Company Law——Focusing on legal supervision of the company
Entrepreneurship serves as a critical stimulant to market vitality and a pivotal driver of social innovation.The entrepreneurship clause represents the legal articulation of the overall market system's plan,serving as a rational enhancement to the internal framework of the Company Law.The entrepreneurship clause is a legal expression for implementing China's market system strategy and also a rational value for filling the internal system of the Company Law.In the application of the new law,the value leading function of the entrepreneurship clause should be fully activated to avoid the risk of a new round of interest imbalance caused by the isolated application of legal regulatory norms,and to prevent the deviation of the practical purpose of the entrepreneurship clause.The entrepreneurship clause's embodiment of individualistic values necessitates that the Company Law promotes the decisive role of the market in resource allocation,with a strong emphasis on the autonomy of entrepreneurs as the linchpin of corporate governance.Guided by the individualistic value of entrepreneurship clauses,the following interpretations and applications of legal reg-ulatory norms for companies should be made:firstly,easing the legal compulsory supervision of directors,supervisors,senior executives,and dual controllers,and returning to corporate self-determination and market guidance.Secondly,follow the substantive examination standards for situations where the resolution is not established.Thirdly,establish more specific requirements review standards for the principle of prohibiting the abuse of shareholder rights,shifting from protecting vulnerable shareholders to protecting oppressed shareholders.

冉克平、曹蔚轩

展开 >

武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉 430072

企业家精神 新《公司法》 董监高责任 决议不成立 股东权利滥用

国家社会科学基金重点项目

21AZD030

2024

东岳论丛
山东社会科学院

东岳论丛

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.487
ISSN:1003-8353
年,卷(期):2024.45(8)
  • 24