The regulatory model transformation of the"Non-four Categories"expert opinions——a transition from two-dimensional regulatory model to three-dimensional regulatory model
"Non-four categories"expert opinions,which constitue a distinct classification in parallel with"four categories"expert opinions are not as new institutional developments,but a reflection of the transitional institutional choices made by judicial administrative organs aiming to aligning the allocation of judicial resources with practical needs.Currently,the"administrative-judicial"two-dimensional regulatory model applied to"four categories"expert opinions also serves as the regulatory framework for"non-four categories"expert opinions.However,this model emphasizes formal regulations based on the evidence's legal attributes while overlooking substantive regulations grounded in scientific attributes.Furthermore,judicial practices reveal that the"administrative"regulatory model is developed mainly on the focus of the forensic expert,whereas the"judicial"regulatory model on the focus of the forensic result.Therefore,it is necessary to realign the legal attributes of"non-four categories"expert opinions with the scientific attributes.It is better to transform the localized"administrative-judicial"two-dimensional regulatory model into a systematized"administrative-judicial-industry"three-dimensional regulatory model,by incorporating insights from foreign"industrial"regulatory models.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
