论法官前理解的应然脉络与规范路径
The normative framework of judges'pre-understanding and the path to regulation:a perspective from preventive environmental public-interest litigation
周旭 1朱兵强2
作者信息
- 1. 武汉大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430072
- 2. 湖南师范大学 法学院,湖南 长沙 410081
- 折叠
摘要
法官的前理解是司法裁量活动的重要组成部分,在预防性环境公益诉讼领域,尤其显示出裁量定调与思路拓展的价值.前理解的形成与检验过程覆盖了司法诉讼的整个环节,并存在于司法三段论推理衔接与联络的必要性.纵观我国的司法实践,尚缺乏定性与约束法官前理解的规范体系与监督机制,仅有的前理解尝试也无法与司法三段论推理实现方向与步骤的衔接,绝大部分法官更缺乏形成前理解的基础条件.对此,有必要发展"柔性引导为主、刚性监管为辅"的前理解约束体系,在总结与探索的基础上细化前理解与司法三段论推理的对接要点,并从源头提供前理解规范化的理想资源与环境,以在弥补预防性环境公益诉讼的专业性不足的同时,促进司法活动的规范化.
Abstract
The judge's pre-understanding is an integral part of judicial discretion,especially in the preventive environmental public interest litigations.Such pre-understanding showcases the value of judges'discretion and the value of broad perspectives.The formation and examination process of pre-understanding covers the entire range of judicial proceedings,and needs to be integrated and linked with the judiciary syllogistic reasoning.In China's judicial context,there is a lack of standardized systems and supervision mechanisms in defining and restricting judges'pre-understanding.The limited attempts in defining pre-understanding also fail to integrate smoothly with the direction and steps of judiciary syllogistic reasoning.Furthermore,most judges lack the basic conditions for forming pre-understanding.Therefore,it is necessary to develop a pre-understanding constraint system that features"flexible guidance with supplemental rigid supervision".Based on summarization and exploration,it's crucial to refine the key alignment points between pre-understanding and judiciary syllogistic reasoning.Additionally,it's essential to provide ideal resources and contexts to standardize pre-understanding from the root-cause.This approach aims to make up for the deficiency of insufficient professionalism in the preventive environmental public-interest litigation and promote the standardization of judicial activities.
关键词
前理解/预防性环境公益诉讼/司法三段论/规范涵摄/利益衡量Key words
Pre-understanding/Preventive environmental public-interest litigation/Judiciary syllogism reasoning/Normative deductive method/Interest balancing引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据