智能代理是刑事程序中的证人吗?
Intelligent agents as a sort of witness in criminal proceedings?
萨比娜·格雷斯 1托马斯·魏根特 樊文2
作者信息
- 1. 瑞士巴塞尔大学法学院;德国马普犯罪、安全与法律研究所"刑事司法中的算法解析和自动决策"项目小组
- 2. 德国弗莱堡大学;中国社会科学院大学法学院;中国社会科学院法学研究所
- 折叠
摘要
人工智能(AI)驱动的"智能设备"日益成为刑事程序所用证据的信息源.日趋复杂的机器学习方法产生了越来越多的人工智能生成的证据,这种自主生成的数据(比如使用现代汽车时生成的数据)的重要性可能会变得愈发突出.本文研究了来自人工智能系多个应用领域的此类证据的可采性,解释了如何将此类系统生成的数据作为证据引入刑事程序,并在讨论可能的解决方案之前,特别是讨论人工智能系统成为自身的证人并接受其他人工智能系统可靠性审查的可能性之前,分析了这类数据在诉讼法上的相关证据问题.
Abstract
'Smart devices'empowered by artificial intelligence(AI)are increasingly the origin of information used as evidence in criminal proceedings.The importance of such autonomously generated data,for instance data generated when using modern automobiles,is likely to become even more important as increasingly complex methods of machine learning lead to more AI-generated evidence.This article reviews the admissibility of such evidence stemming from various areas of application of AI-systems.It explains how data generated by such systems could be introduced as evidence into criminal proceedings and,analyses the relevant evidentiary problems,before it discusses possible solutions,in particular the possibility of AI-systems becoming a sort of witness of its own and being vetted for reliability by other AI-systems.
关键词
人工智能系统/刑事程序中的证据/刑事程序中证据的可采纳性/对质权/刑事程序中的证人/刑事程序中的专家证人/不自证其罪的权利/刑事程序中作为证据的数据Key words
AI-systems/Evidence in criminal proceedings/Admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings/Right to Confrontation/Witnesses in criminal proceedings/Expert witnesses in criminal proceedings/Privilege against self-incrimination/Data as evidence in crimina引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据