首页|金电极面积两种计算方法的比较研究

金电极面积两种计算方法的比较研究

扫码查看
基于电沉积方法,通过改变沉积时间(t)在金电极表面沉积纳米金,得到纳米金修饰电极.运用Randles-Sevcik法和氧还原法分别求算电极面积(AD和AO)和粗糙因子(Rf(D)和Rf(O)),探讨两种方法求算结果的相关性.研究表明,电极面积随t的增长而线性增大.和Randles-Sevcik法相比,氧还原法得到的电极面积和粗糙因子较大,AO和Rf(O)~t的线性斜率是AD和Rf(D)~t的7倍.因此,氧还原法求算的面积更能反映电极的微观粗糙度.当Rf(O)较小时,Rf(D)/Rf(O)接近1,两种方法求得的粗糙因子接近;随着Rf(O)的增大,Rf(D)/Rf(O)逐渐降低;当Rf(O)大于5时,Rf(D)/Rf(O)在0.25附近,基本不变.这些结论对于金电极面积的计算及应用具有一定的指导意义.
Comparative Study on Two Calculation Methods of Gold Electrode Area
In this article we electrodeposited nanogold on a bare gold surface to obtain a series of nanogold modified electrodes by changing the electrodeposition time(t).The electrode area(AD and AO)and roughness factor(Rf(D)and Rf(O))were calculated based on the Randles-Sevcik method and oxygen reduction method respectively,and the relationship between the two methods was explored.Results indicated that the electrode area increased linearly with the increase of t.Compared with the Randles-Sevcik method,the electrode area and roughness factor obtained by the oxygen reduction method increased more rapidly with t.The linear slope of Af and Rf(O)-t was seven times that of AD and Rf(D)-t.Therefore,the area calculated by the oxygen reduction method could better reflect the real electrode roughness.When Rf(O)was smaller,Rf(D)/Rf(O)approached 1,and the roughness factors obtained by the two methods were close;As Rf(O)increased,Rf(D)/Rf(O)gradually decreased;When Rf(O)was bigger than 5,Rf(D)/Rf(O)remained basically unchanged around 0.25.These conclusions provided guidance for the calculation and application of gold electrode area.

Gold electrodeElectrodepositionCalculation of electrode areaRoughness factor

张玲玲、骆恩淇、刘玉革、贾永梅、李靓、姚佳琳、李志果

展开 >

岭南师范学院化学化工学院,清洁能源材料化学广东普通高校重点实验室,广东湛江 524048

金电极 电沉积 电极面积计算 粗糙因子

2024

分析科学学报
武汉大学,北京大学,南京大学

分析科学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.717
ISSN:1006-6144
年,卷(期):2024.40(6)