首页|学术争鸣与中国法理学的发展

学术争鸣与中国法理学的发展

扫码查看
学术争鸣对中国法理学的发展具有特殊意义.相比于部门法学,法理学的话题相对分散,方法更加多元,立场分歧影响更大,由此带来互动无效性和发展无序性的质疑.通过对近二十年来中国法理学发生的十场学术争鸣的考察可以发现,法理学讨论的意义首先维系学科自身的存在价值,同时也具有聚焦核心议题、拓展法理学论域、提升方法论自觉、增进问题内省和论证深入、建构学理体系的价值.未来中国法理学的发展存在着研究论域上向部门法理学拓展,研究进路上向流派化演变,以及研究姿态上向参与者转换的趋势.
Academic debate has special significance to the development of Chinese jurisprudence.The orderliness of the development in jurisprudence as well as the effectiveness of legal theorists'interaction could be in doubt.After examining ten debates in Chinese jurisprudence in the last two decades,it can be found that the debates in jurisprudence are valuable because jurisprudence itself is meaningful.Besides,those debates have five other values on issues,methodology,argumentations and theoretical system construction.Three tendencies of Chinese jurisprudence development were shown as well:from general ju-risprudence to special jurisprudence,from methodological blindness to consciousness,from translating foreign theory to partic-ipating in debates of worldwide jurisprudence.

Academic DebateChinese JurisprudenceDevelopment of DisciplineSelf-observation

曾立城、雷磊

展开 >

中国政法大学

学术争鸣 中国法理学 学科发展 自我观察

教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助重大项目(2021)

21JHQ012

2024

法学评论
武汉大学

法学评论

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.308
ISSN:1004-1303
年,卷(期):2024.42(1)
  • 15