首页|"合众为一":代表人诉讼判决效力论

"合众为一":代表人诉讼判决效力论

扫码查看
代表人诉讼的本质特征在于"合众为一",以有限或特定的代表人原告实施诉讼,但判决对整个群体有效,属于既判力相对性之例外.代表人诉讼的诉讼标的是超越个人权利的"群体权利",包括扩散权利、集合权利、同源个人权利三种.以群体权利为媒介,代表人诉讼判决在群体权利人的主体范围内发生既判力.人数不确定代表人诉讼判决对全体参加登记的权利人有效,并向未参加登记的权利人发生既判力(拘束效)扩张.证券特别代表人诉讼判决对未声明退出的投资者有效,遮断后者提起个别诉讼,并向声明退出的投资者发生既判力(拘束效)扩张.当然,选择退出的投资者保留提出新攻击防御方法的灵活空间.
The essential characteristic of representative action lies in the"out of many,one",in which the action is car-ried out by limited or specific representative plaintiffs,but the judgment binds the group as a whole,which is an exception to the principle of relativity of res judicata.The subject matter of representative action is"group right"that transcend individual rights,including diffuse right,collective right,and homologous individual rights.With group right as the medium,the repre-sentative action judgment binds all the group right holders.A judgment in an aciton by representatives with uncertain numbers is effective for all the registered right holders,and res judicata(binding effect)expansion occurs to the non-registering right holders.A judgment in a special representative action for security is effective for all the investors who have not opted out,pre-cludes the latter from filing individual actions,and res judicata(binding effect)entends to those who have opted out.Of course,the opt-out investors retain the flexibility to propose new attacks and defenses in individual actions.

Representative ActionsGroup RightRes JudicataPre-determinative EffectOpt Out

陈杭平

展开 >

清华大学法学院

代表人诉讼 群体权利 既判力 预决效 选择退出

国家社会科学基金一般项目

19BFX080

2024

法学评论
武汉大学

法学评论

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.308
ISSN:1004-1303
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 80