首页|数据抓取的合法性边界探究

数据抓取的合法性边界探究

扫码查看
数据抓取不仅有可能侵犯公民的个人信息权益,更频繁引发企业间的利益冲突,因此成为学界与业界共同关注的热点.产权配置思路下的"数据库保护权""数据生产者权"等方案不仅违背了数据自由流通的基本原则,亦存在难以克服的技术性难题,法益衡平成为解决问题的基本思路.对无涉个人信息的数据抓取,法益衡平实际是在保障数据自由流通的前提下,识别数据形成的何种竞争优势值得通过禁止抓取的方式予以保护,具体过程应根据数据控制者是否采取技术性措施以及前述措施的不同类型进行讨论.当涉及个人信息时,法益衡平还应确保抓取方立足信息的可识别性落实个人信息保护义务.在此过程中,敏感个人信息应被强化保护,数据体现公开个人信息时,抓取活动一般应被允许.
Data capture may not only infringe the rights and interests of personal information,but also frequently cause conflicts of interest between enterprises.Therefore,it has become a hot topic of common concern in academia and industry.The"database protection right""data producer right"and other schemes under the idea of property rights allocation not only violate the basic principle of free circulation of data,but also have technical difficulties that are difficult to overcome.Equity of legal interests has become the basic idea to solve the problem.For enterprise data without personal information,the equity of legal interests is to identify which competitive advantages formed by the data are worth protecting by means of prohibiting cap-ture on the premise of ensuring the free flow of data.The competitive advantage that is worth protecting is the individual legal interest that is reflected in the act of seizing when it damages the public interest.When personal information is involved,the equity of legal interests should ensure that the acquirer implements the obligation of personal information protection in combi-nation with the identifiability of the information,and strengthen the protection of sensitive personal information.At the same time,data capture involving public personal information should be allowed as much as possible.

Data CaptureEquity of Legal InterestsPersonal Information ProtectionLegitimacy Boundary

郭传凯

展开 >

山东大学法学院

数据抓取 法益衡平 个人信息保护 合法性边界

国家社会科学基金青年项目山东大学人文社会科学创新团队项目

22CFX039

2024

法学评论
武汉大学

法学评论

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.308
ISSN:1004-1303
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 45